LAI KAM WAH v. TALENT SUN INVESTMENT LTD

LAI KAM WAH v. TALENT SUN INVESTMENT LTD

Clause 3, read as a whole, bears its plain and ordinary meaning that both vendor and purchaser have the right to cancel the Agreement at any time after 1 October 2009; the Option is not void for uncertainty; the plaintiff validly exercised that Option on 14 May 2011; no triable issues were raised to defeat summary judgment; therefore judgment is entered for the plaintiff and the defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Citation
LAI KAM WAH v. TALENT SUN INVESTMENT LTD
Parties
Plaintiff Vendor: bjbj 2I9; Defendant Purchaser: TALENT SUN INVESTMENT LIMITED
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
22 May 2012
Case Number
HCA1166/2011
Procedural Posture
Contract / Property Dispute (summary Judgment; Appeal) / Appeal Heard De Novo From Master Kwang's Summary Judgment Order
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; summary judgment entered for plaintiff; plaintiff's claims in HCA 2524 of 2008 dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Option to Rescind, Construction of Contract, Summary Judgment, Specific Performance, Estoppel, Capacity/title of Executor/co Administrator
Source Language
EN

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

bjbj 2I9

Plaintiff Vendor

TALENT SUN INVESTMENT LIMITED

Defendant Purchaser

Procedural Posture

Contract / Property Dispute (summary Judgment; Appeal) / Appeal Heard De Novo From Master Kwang's Summary Judgment Order

  1. 1 Construction and validity of clause 3 conferring an option to cancel after 1 October 2009
  2. 2 Whether the Option is void for uncertainty
  3. 3 Whether the plaintiff validly exercised the Option on 14 May 2011 and can obtain a declaration of rescission/cancellation

Ratio Decidendi

Clause 3, read as a whole, bears its plain and ordinary meaning that both vendor and purchaser have the right to cancel the Agreement at any time after 1 October 2009; the Option is not void for uncertainty; the plaintiff validly exercised that Option on 14 May 2011; no triable issues were raised to defeat summary judgment; therefore judgment is entered for the plaintiff and the defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; summary judgment entered for plaintiff; plaintiff's claims in HCA 2524 of 2008 dismissed with costs

Orders

  • Judgment entered in favour of the plaintiff in terms of paragraphs 1 and 2 of the Summons as amended
  • Defendant's appeal dismissed with costs to the plaintiff including certificate for counsel