LAI KAM WAH v. TALENT SUN INVESTMENT LTD
Clause 3, read as a whole, bears its plain and ordinary meaning that both vendor and purchaser have the right to cancel the Agreement at any time after 1 October 2009; the Option is not void for uncertainty; the plaintiff validly exercised that Option on 14 May 2011; no triable issues were raised to defeat summary judgment; therefore judgment is entered for the plaintiff and the defendant's appeal is dismissed.
- Citation
- LAI KAM WAH v. TALENT SUN INVESTMENT LTD
- Parties
- Plaintiff Vendor: bjbj 2I9; Defendant Purchaser: TALENT SUN INVESTMENT LIMITED
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 22 May 2012
- Case Number
- HCA1166/2011
- Procedural Posture
- Contract / Property Dispute (summary Judgment; Appeal) / Appeal Heard De Novo From Master Kwang's Summary Judgment Order
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; summary judgment entered for plaintiff; plaintiff's claims in HCA 2524 of 2008 dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Option to Rescind, Construction of Contract, Summary Judgment, Specific Performance, Estoppel, Capacity/title of Executor/co Administrator
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
bjbj 2I9
Plaintiff Vendor
TALENT SUN INVESTMENT LIMITED
Defendant Purchaser
Procedural Posture
Contract / Property Dispute (summary Judgment; Appeal) / Appeal Heard De Novo From Master Kwang's Summary Judgment Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Construction and validity of clause 3 conferring an option to cancel after 1 October 2009
- 2 Whether the Option is void for uncertainty
- 3 Whether the plaintiff validly exercised the Option on 14 May 2011 and can obtain a declaration of rescission/cancellation
Ratio Decidendi
Clause 3, read as a whole, bears its plain and ordinary meaning that both vendor and purchaser have the right to cancel the Agreement at any time after 1 October 2009; the Option is not void for uncertainty; the plaintiff validly exercised that Option on 14 May 2011; no triable issues were raised to defeat summary judgment; therefore judgment is entered for the plaintiff and the defendant's appeal is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; summary judgment entered for plaintiff; plaintiff's claims in HCA 2524 of 2008 dismissed with costs
Orders
- Judgment entered in favour of the plaintiff in terms of paragraphs 1 and 2 of the Summons as amended
- Defendant's appeal dismissed with costs to the plaintiff including certificate for counsel
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment