ORION ENGINEERED CARBONS GMBH v. UNIVERSAL ALL LTD AND OTHERS
Default judgment was granted against the Remaining HCA defendants on the pleaded restitution and tracing claims; however the court held that section 52 Trustee Ordinance does not support vesting orders in this fraud/remedial constructive trust context and therefore refused vesting orders, and refused garnishee...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] HKCFI 2370
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Orion Engineered Carbons GMBH; 1st Defendant: UNIVERSAL ALL LIMITED (萬能全有限公司); 2nd Defendant: hk chengx trading limited (香港承禧貿易有限公司); 3rd Defendant: ccxian trade limited (燦翔貿易有限公司); 4th Defendant: cers limited (晟爾斯有限公司); 5th Defendant: hongbo trading limited (洪波貿易有限公司); 6th Defendant: yushen trading co., limited (渝深貿易有限公司); 7th Defendant: xyn trading limited (訊遠貿易有限公司); 8th Defendant: kiiru limited (奇如有限公司); 9th Defendant: can bie limited (川北有限公司); 10th Defendant: dianf limited (帝安貿易有限公司); 11th Defendant: nanxio limited (南雄有限公司); 12th Defendant: tengyang technology limited (騰揚科技有限公司); 13th Defendant: LONGHUA CO., LIMITED (隆華有限公司); 14th Defendant: JSMAO LIMITED (金士茂有限公司); 15th Defendant: HANGJI LIMITED (航健貿易有限公司); 16th Defendant: WANGHAI LIMITED (望海有限公司); 17th Defendant (hca): FUHENG LIMITED (福恆科技有限公司); 18th Defendant (hca): TABEI LIMITED (泰貝有限公司); 17th Defendant (hcmp): industrial and commercial bank of china (asia) limited; 18th Defendant (hcmp): standard chartered bank (Hong kong) limited; 19th Defendant (hcmp): china construction bank (asia) corporation limited; 20th Defendant (hcmp): bank of communications (hong kong) limited; 21st Defendant (hcmp): china citic bank international limited; 22nd Defendant (hcmp): dah sing bank, limited; 23rd Defendant (hcmp): fubon bank (hong kong) limited
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 30 May 2025
- Case Number
- HCMP210/2025
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Proprietary and Mareva Injunction; Enforcement Proceedings (vesting/garnishee) / Default Judgment Application Granted; Enforcement (vesting Order and Garnishee) Applications Heard (first Appointment)
- Outcome
- Default judgment entered against the Remaining HCA defendants; applications for vesting orders under s52 Trustee Ordinance refused; garnishee orders nisi refused as premature; costs allocated against plaintiff for HCMP 210 (including banks' indemnity costs)
- Legal Topics
- Vesting Orders Under Trustee Ordinance S52, Constructive Trusts (remedial Vs Institutional), Garnishee Orders, Mareva (freezing) Injunction, Default Judgment, Tracing and Restitution, Costs (indemnity/summarily Assessed)
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Orion Engineered Carbons GMBH
Plaintiff
UNIVERSAL ALL LIMITED (萬能全有限公司)
1st Defendant
hk chengx trading limited (香港承禧貿易有限公司)
2nd Defendant
ccxian trade limited (燦翔貿易有限公司)
3rd Defendant
cers limited (晟爾斯有限公司)
4th Defendant
hongbo trading limited (洪波貿易有限公司)
5th Defendant
yushen trading co., limited (渝深貿易有限公司)
6th Defendant
xyn trading limited (訊遠貿易有限公司)
7th Defendant
kiiru limited (奇如有限公司)
8th Defendant
can bie limited (川北有限公司)
9th Defendant
dianf limited (帝安貿易有限公司)
10th Defendant
nanxio limited (南雄有限公司)
11th Defendant
tengyang technology limited (騰揚科技有限公司)
12th Defendant
LONGHUA CO., LIMITED (隆華有限公司)
13th Defendant
JSMAO LIMITED (金士茂有限公司)
14th Defendant
HANGJI LIMITED (航健貿易有限公司)
15th Defendant
WANGHAI LIMITED (望海有限公司)
16th Defendant
FUHENG LIMITED (福恆科技有限公司)
17th Defendant (hca)
TABEI LIMITED (泰貝有限公司)
18th Defendant (hca)
industrial and commercial bank of china (asia) limited
17th Defendant (hcmp)
standard chartered bank (Hong kong) limited
18th Defendant (hcmp)
china construction bank (asia) corporation limited
19th Defendant (hcmp)
bank of communications (hong kong) limited
20th Defendant (hcmp)
china citic bank international limited
21st Defendant (hcmp)
dah sing bank, limited
22nd Defendant (hcmp)
fubon bank (hong kong) limited
23rd Defendant (hcmp)
Procedural Posture
Civil Proprietary and Mareva Injunction; Enforcement Proceedings (vesting/garnishee) / Default Judgment Application Granted; Enforcement (vesting Order and Garnishee) Applications Heard (first Appointment)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether section 52 of the Trustee Ordinance supports vesting orders to vest wrongfully received funds in the plaintiff where defendants are remedial constructive trustees
- 2 Whether garnishee orders nisi can be obtained prior to entry of judgment
- 3 Whether default judgment should be entered against defendants who did not acknowledge service
Ratio Decidendi
Default judgment was granted against the Remaining HCA defendants on the pleaded restitution and tracing claims; however the court held that section 52 Trustee Ordinance does not support vesting orders in this fraud/remedial constructive trust context and therefore refused vesting orders, and refused garnishee orders as premature absent a judgment-based enforcement process; costs of HCMP 210 were ordered against the plaintiff, including indemnity costs for the banks if claimed.
Court Disposition
Default judgment entered against the Remaining HCA defendants; applications for vesting orders under s52 Trustee Ordinance refused; garnishee orders nisi refused as premature; costs allocated against plaintiff for HCMP 210 (including banks' indemnity costs)
Orders
- Default Judgment granted against the Remaining HCA Defendants in terms of §1 of Draft Order A
- Injunctions varied in terms of §§2 and 3 of Draft Order A to create an exception for purpose of satisfying the Default Judgment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment