PANG LAI YIN v. THE LAW SOCIETY OF HONG KONG
The Court granted the Applicant's exemption from producing Form 4 because the application concerned admission formalities and the Law Society certified the Applicant as fit and proper; Chan's proposed intervention and striking out applications were dismissed because they sought to litigate reputation issues collateral to the application and were unnecessary for determination of the exemption; leave to appeal was refused as Chan's grounds did not justify appeal; costs were ordered against Chan and summarily assessed to HKD 28,000 for the Applicant and HKD 20,600 for the Law Society.
- Citation
- PANG LAI YIN v. THE LAW SOCIETY OF HONG KONG
- Parties
- Applicant: Pang Lai Yin; Respondent/intervener: Chan Kin Fung, Phil; Interested Party: The Law Society of Hong Kong
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 26 January 2011
- Case Number
- HCMP1719/2010
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Exemption From Producing Form 4 Under Admission and Registration Rules; Related Summons for Intervention and Leave to Appeal / Decision on Originating Summons and Related Summons; Leave to Appeal Refused; Costs Summarily Assessed
- Outcome
- Application for exemption granted; summons by Chan to intervene and to strike out parts of the affirmations dismissed; leave to appeal refused; costs awarded against Chan.
- Legal Topics
- Form 4 Exemption (rule 13), Intervention in Proceedings, Striking Out Scandalous Matters, Summary Assessment of Costs (o.62 R.9 A), Leave to Appeal, Articles of Bills of Rights and Basic Law Invoked
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Pang Lai Yin
Applicant
Chan Kin Fung, Phil
Respondent/intervener
The Law Society of Hong Kong
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Application for Exemption From Producing Form 4 Under Admission and Registration Rules; Related Summons for Intervention and Leave to Appeal / Decision on Originating Summons and Related Summons; Leave to Appeal Refused; Costs Summarily Assessed
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Applicant should be exempted from producing Form 4 for the traineeship period under Rule 13 of the Admission and Registration Rules
- 2 Whether Chan should be granted leave to intervene to protect his reputation and to strike out allegations as scandalous and irrelevant
- 3 Whether leave to appeal should be granted against the dismissal of Chan's application and costs orders
Ratio Decidendi
The Court granted the Applicant's exemption from producing Form 4 because the application concerned admission formalities and the Law Society certified the Applicant as fit and proper; Chan's proposed intervention and striking out applications were dismissed because they sought to litigate reputation issues collateral to the application and were unnecessary for determination of the exemption; leave to appeal was refused as Chan's grounds did not justify appeal; costs were ordered against Chan and summarily assessed to HKD 28,000 for the Applicant and HKD 20,600 for the Law Society.
Court Disposition
Application for exemption granted; summons by Chan to intervene and to strike out parts of the affirmations dismissed; leave to appeal refused; costs awarded against Chan.
Orders
- Applicant exempted from producing Form 4 for the relevant traineeship period
- Order dismissing Chan Kin Fung Phil's application to intervene and to strike out affirmations
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment