LAI CHIK KUN MICHAEL AND OTHERS v. THE BAPTIST CONVENTION OF HONG KONG AND ANOTHER
Summons dismissed because no relief was claimed against SJ, SJ had no personal knowledge to assist factually, his attendance would duplicate existing counsel and impose disproportionate public and trust costs, and his decision not to participate was a lawful, rational exercise of discretion.
- Citation
- [2025] HKCFI 647
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: LAI CHIK KUN MICHAEL; 2nd Plaintiff: KOO MING KOWN; 3rd Plaintiff: CHIENG SAI YUNG WILSON; 4th Plaintiff: WOO HON YUE; 5th Plaintiff: CHAN TAK WAH; 6th Plaintiff: KO JACK LUM; 1st Defendant: THE BAPTIST CONVENTION OF HONG KONG; 2nd Defendant: THE SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 11 February 2025
- Case Number
- HCA2741/2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Action Concerning Charitable Trust and Recovery of Donations / Interlocutory Hearing on Plaintiffs' Summons to Compel Secretary for Justice to Attend Trial
- Outcome
- Summons dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Parens Patriae, Charitable Trust, Breach of Trust, Attendance at Trial, Proportionality, Public Funds Allocation
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
LAI CHIK KUN MICHAEL
1st Plaintiff
KOO MING KOWN
2nd Plaintiff
CHIENG SAI YUNG WILSON
3rd Plaintiff
WOO HON YUE
4th Plaintiff
CHAN TAK WAH
5th Plaintiff
KO JACK LUM
6th Plaintiff
THE BAPTIST CONVENTION OF HONG KONG
1st Defendant
THE SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Action Concerning Charitable Trust and Recovery of Donations / Interlocutory Hearing on Plaintiffs' Summons to Compel Secretary for Justice to Attend Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a charitable trust exists
- 2 Whether the 1st Defendant breached trustee duties
- 3 Whether the Secretary for Justice should be compelled to attend and participate at trial
Ratio Decidendi
Summons dismissed because no relief was claimed against SJ, SJ had no personal knowledge to assist factually, his attendance would duplicate existing counsel and impose disproportionate public and trust costs, and his decision not to participate was a lawful, rational exercise of discretion.
Court Disposition
Summons dismissed
Orders
- Summons dismissed with costs to be borne by the Plaintiffs
- On a nisi basis costs to the Secretary for Justice are summarily assessed at HKD 57441
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment