YAU KWAI AND OTHERS v. YAU KAR SIU AND OTHERS
Consolidation did not make distinct claims the same for costs purposes; plaintiffs entitled to costs for the ex parte injunction, but defendants entitled to costs of HCA7129/1997; because of overall conduct and time spent the judge apportioned costs by ordering plaintiffs to pay defendants 20% of the costs of the proceedings to date (including the 18 November 2004 hearing); defendants not liable to pay plaintiffs the costs of the injunction application; costs increase caused by joinder of 1st and 2nd defendants to be borne by plaintiffs.
- Citation
- YAU KWAI AND OTHERS v. YAU KAR SIU AND OTHERS
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: YAU KWAI; 1st Plaintiff: YAU FUI; 1st Plaintiff: YAU CHE WAI; Plaintiff (successor): YAU CHI WING; Plaintiff (successor): YAU CHI ON; 2nd Plaintiff: YAU TIN SUNG; 2nd Plaintiff: YAU TIN SANG COLIN; 1st Defendant: YAU KAR SIU; 2nd Defendant: YAU LOI; 3rd Defendant: VICTORY VILLA MANAGEMENT LIMITED
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 16 December 2004
- Case Number
- HCMP1363/2003
- Procedural Posture
- Partition and Related Claims (trespass, Title Dispute, Injunction) / Decision (judgment Dated 16 December 2004)
- Outcome
- Partition granted; costs allocated between parties with specific apportionment orders.
- Legal Topics
- Partition Order, Trespass, Title Dispute, Injunction, Costs Allocation, Consolidation
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
YAU KWAI
1st Plaintiff
YAU FUI
1st Plaintiff
YAU CHE WAI
1st Plaintiff
YAU CHI WING
Plaintiff (successor)
YAU CHI ON
Plaintiff (successor)
YAU TIN SUNG
2nd Plaintiff
YAU TIN SANG COLIN
2nd Plaintiff
YAU KAR SIU
1st Defendant
YAU LOI
2nd Defendant
VICTORY VILLA MANAGEMENT LIMITED
3rd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Partition and Related Claims (trespass, Title Dispute, Injunction) / Decision (judgment Dated 16 December 2004)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether partition should be ordered under Partition Ordinance s.4
- 2 Validity of trespass and title claims against 3rd defendant based on Chinese customary law
- 3 Entitlement to ex parte injunction
Ratio Decidendi
Consolidation did not make distinct claims the same for costs purposes; plaintiffs entitled to costs for the ex parte injunction, but defendants entitled to costs of HCA7129/1997; because of overall conduct and time spent the judge apportioned costs by ordering plaintiffs to pay defendants 20% of the costs of the proceedings to date (including the 18 November 2004 hearing); defendants not liable to pay plaintiffs the costs of the injunction application; costs increase caused by joinder of 1st and 2nd defendants to be borne by plaintiffs.
Court Disposition
Partition granted; costs allocated between parties with specific apportionment orders.
Orders
- Partition ordered (HCMP1363/2003)
- Plaintiffs entitled to costs of the ex parte injunction (para.62 of judgment)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment