GUANGZHOU GREEN-ENHAN BIO-ENGINEERING CO LTD AND ANOTHER v. GREEN POWER HEALTH PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL CO LTD AND OTHERS
The court refused to grant the ex parte gagging order because the defendants failed to show sufficient urgency or that irreparable harm would occur pending an inter parte hearing, the matter raised issues pertinent to a potential new action which had not been commenced, and the defendants did not provide financial evidence to support undertakings as to damages; the application was adjourned for full inter parte consideration and directions were given for filing evidence and submissions.
- Citation
- GUANGZHOU GREEN-ENHAN BIO-ENGINEERING CO LTD AND ANOTHER v. GREEN POWER HEALTH PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL CO LTD AND OTHERS
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: Guangzhou Green-Enhan Bio-Engineering Co. Ltd; 1st Defendant: 1st Defendant; 2nd Defendant: 2nd Defendant
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 21 April 2005
- Case Number
- HCA2802/2003
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Intellectual Property (passing Off) With Applications for Injunction and Stay / Interim Ex Parte Application for Gagging Order Refused; Adjourned to Inter Parte Hearing
- Outcome
- Application for ex parte gagging order refused; matter adjourned for inter parte hearing
- Legal Topics
- Passing Off, Goodwill, Gagging Order, Stay of Execution, Ex Parte Application
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Guangzhou Green-Enhan Bio-Engineering Co. Ltd
1st Plaintiff
1st Defendant
1st Defendant
2nd Defendant
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Intellectual Property (passing Off) With Applications for Injunction and Stay / Interim Ex Parte Application for Gagging Order Refused; Adjourned to Inter Parte Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an ex parte gagging order should be granted
- 2 Whether the advertisements gave rise to a new cause of action or justified interlocutory relief in existing proceedings
- 3 Whether urgency and risk of irremediable harm justified acting without notice
Ratio Decidendi
The court refused to grant the ex parte gagging order because the defendants failed to show sufficient urgency or that irreparable harm would occur pending an inter parte hearing, the matter raised issues pertinent to a potential new action which had not been commenced, and the defendants did not provide financial evidence to support undertakings as to damages; the application was adjourned for full inter parte consideration and directions were given for filing evidence and submissions.
Court Disposition
Application for ex parte gagging order refused; matter adjourned for inter parte hearing
Orders
- Adjourned to 25 April 2005 for inter parte hearing
- Directions for filing of evidence and skeleton submissions
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment