CHOW CHUN KIT, the personal representative of the estate of CHOW WING CHEUK v. CHOW PO YUEN, a minor by PANG ZHENG YUN, her guardian ad litem
The court accepted the joint DNA test report as authentic and reliable and found the son administrator discharged the burden of rebutting the statutory presumption of paternity under s5(1)(b) Cap 429; accordingly the infant was not established as a natural child of the deceased and the son administrator succeeded in both HCMP 1400/2014 and HCMP 1455/2014.
- Citation
- [2019] HKCFI 1112
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff (infant) in HCMP 1400/2014: Ms Chow Po Yuen; Natural Mother and Former Plaintiff / Guardian Ad Litem: Mdm Pang; Plaintiff in HCMP 1455/2014; Son Administrator: Mr Chow Chun Kit; Deceased (testator): Mr Chow Wing Cheuk; Widow; Defendant in HCMP 1400/2014: Mdm Chow; Lawful Daughter; Defendant in HCMP 1400/2014: Ms Chow
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 30 April 2019
- Case Number
- HCMP1455/2014
- Procedural Posture
- Inheritance/succession (intestate) / Judgment After Trial (hcmp 1400/2014 and HCMP 1455/2014 Heard Together)
- Outcome
- Judgment for the son administrator (defendant); the infant is not found to be the natural child of the deceased for succession purposes; son administrator's declarations succeed in HCMP 1400/2014 and HCMP 1455/2014
- Legal Topics
- Paternity, Intestacy, DNA Evidence, Presumption of Paternity, Costs
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ms Chow Po Yuen
1st Plaintiff (infant) in HCMP 1400/2014
Mdm Pang
Natural Mother and Former Plaintiff / Guardian Ad Litem
Mr Chow Chun Kit
Plaintiff in HCMP 1455/2014; Son Administrator
Mr Chow Wing Cheuk
Deceased (testator)
Mdm Chow
Widow; Defendant in HCMP 1400/2014
Ms Chow
Lawful Daughter; Defendant in HCMP 1400/2014
Procedural Posture
Inheritance/succession (intestate) / Judgment After Trial (hcmp 1400/2014 and HCMP 1455/2014 Heard Together)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the infant is a natural child of the deceased and entitled to succeed under Intestates Estates Ordinance (Cap 73)
- 2 Whether the presumption of paternity under s5(1)(b) Parent and Child Ordinance (Cap 429) has been rebutted
- 3 What weight to accord the joint DNA test report prepared in a deficiency case
Ratio Decidendi
The court accepted the joint DNA test report as authentic and reliable and found the son administrator discharged the burden of rebutting the statutory presumption of paternity under s5(1)(b) Cap 429; accordingly the infant was not established as a natural child of the deceased and the son administrator succeeded in both HCMP 1400/2014 and HCMP 1455/2014.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the son administrator (defendant); the infant is not found to be the natural child of the deceased for succession purposes; son administrator's declarations succeed in HCMP 1400/2014 and HCMP 1455/2014
Orders
- Costs of HCMP 1400/2014 and HCMP 1455/2014 to be paid by the infant girl to the son administrator, to be taxed if not agreed
- Infant girl's own costs to be taxed in accordance with the Legal Aid Regulations (Cap 91A)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment