PHAM THI LE v. TORTURE CLAIMS APPEAL BOARD / NON-REFOULEMENT CLAIMS PETITION OFFICE [Decision on Leave Application]
The applicant expressly withdrew the application and there was nothing outstanding in the action; applying Re Manik Md Mahamudun Nabi the correct disposal was dismissal of the application rather than leaving the action at large.
- Citation
- [2023] HKCFI 3191
- Parties
- Applicant: Pham Thi Le; Putative Respondent: Torture Claims Appeal Board/Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office; Putative Interested Party: Director of Immigration
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 18 December 2023
- Case Number
- HCAL2218/2020
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review Leave Application / Leave Application Dismissed
- Outcome
- Application for leave to apply for judicial review dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Non Refoulement, Torture Claim, Withdrawal of Application, Leave to Apply for Judicial Review
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Pham Thi Le
Applicant
Torture Claims Appeal Board/Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office
Putative Respondent
Director of Immigration
Putative Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Leave Application / Leave Application Dismissed
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave to apply for judicial review should be granted
- 2 Effect of applicant's withdrawal of the application
- 3 Proper disposition where nothing remains outstanding in the action
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant expressly withdrew the application and there was nothing outstanding in the action; applying Re Manik Md Mahamudun Nabi the correct disposal was dismissal of the application rather than leaving the action at large.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to apply for judicial review dismissed.
Orders
- Leave to apply for judicial review dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment