PHAM THI VAN ANH FOR HOANG PHUONG THAO v. DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION AND ANOTHER [Decision on Leave Application]
Applicants were more than eight months late with no adequate explanation; their proposed grounds disclosed no arguable error of law or procedural unfairness and lacked reasonable prospects of success; the Director and the Board lawfully found the risk to be localized with state protection and internal relocation available; therefore no extension of time granted and leave dismissed.
- Citation
- [2019] HKCFI 2182
- Parties
- Applicant: Pham Thi Van Anh; Applicant: Pham Thi Van Anh for Hoang Chan Thanh; Applicant: Pham Thi Van Anh for Hoang Phuong Thao; 1st Putative Respondent: Director of Immigration; 2nd Putative Respondent: Torture Claims Appeal Board
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 27 September 2019
- Case Number
- HCAL1485/2018
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Apply for Judicial Review / Leave Application Refused; Extension of Time Refused; Applications Dismissed
- Outcome
- Extension of time refused; leave to apply for judicial review dismissed; applications dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Non Refoulement, Prohibition of Torture and Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment (article 3 Hkbor), Judicial Review (leave), Extension of Time and Delay, Internal Relocation, Risk Assessment, Torture Claims Appeal Board Appeals
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Pham Thi Van Anh
Applicant
Pham Thi Van Anh for Hoang Chan Thanh
Applicant
Pham Thi Van Anh for Hoang Phuong Thao
Applicant
Director of Immigration
1st Putative Respondent
Torture Claims Appeal Board
2nd Putative Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Apply for Judicial Review / Leave Application Refused; Extension of Time Refused; Applications Dismissed
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to extend time for filing leave applications under Order 53 r 4(1)
- 2 Whether the intended judicial review has arguable merit
- 3 Whether the Director of Immigration and the Torture Claims Appeal Board committed error of law or procedural unfairness
Ratio Decidendi
Applicants were more than eight months late with no adequate explanation; their proposed grounds disclosed no arguable error of law or procedural unfairness and lacked reasonable prospects of success; the Director and the Board lawfully found the risk to be localized with state protection and internal relocation available; therefore no extension of time granted and leave dismissed.
Court Disposition
Extension of time refused; leave to apply for judicial review dismissed; applications dismissed.
Orders
- An extension of time for the application for leave to apply for Judicial Review against the decision of the Torture Claims Appeal Board dated 15 June 2017 is refused.
- Leave to apply for Judicial Review is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment