TANG SIU FOR v. TAO CHI SHING AND OTHERS
Extension of time to apply to vary the costs order nisi was granted and the costs order was varied: the 2nd defendant was ordered to pay the plaintiff's costs; the three defendants must bear their own defence costs and are prohibited from seeking or receiving any payment or subsidy from the Tong to indemnify their...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- TANG SIU FOR v. TAO CHI SHING AND OTHERS
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Plaintiff; 1st Defendant: 1st Defendant; 2nd Defendant: To Shui Tai; 3rd Defendant: 3rd Defendant; Applicant (member of the Tong): Mr To Kin Man
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 9 October 2007
- Case Number
- HCA2336/2004
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Dispute Concerning Membership and Management of a Religious Tong (trust) / Post‑judgment Application for Extension of Time to Vary a Costs Order Nisi and Variation of Costs Order
- Outcome
- Application granted in part: time extended; costs order nisi varied to prevent Tong funding of defendants' costs; 2nd defendant ordered to pay plaintiff's costs; 1st and 3rd defendants excused from liability to pay plaintiff's costs and the three defendants ordered not to seek or receive any payment or subsidy from...
- Legal Topics
- Beddoe Order, Costs Order Nisi, Variation of Costs, Membership Disputes in Unincorporated Associations, Pre‑trial Review Warnings
- Source Language
- et
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Plaintiff
Plaintiff
1st Defendant
1st Defendant
To Shui Tai
2nd Defendant
3rd Defendant
3rd Defendant
Mr To Kin Man
Applicant (member of the Tong)
Procedural Posture
Civil Dispute Concerning Membership and Management of a Religious Tong (trust) / Post‑judgment Application for Extension of Time to Vary a Costs Order Nisi and Variation of Costs Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether managers of the Tong could charge the Tong for legal costs without a Beddoe order
- 2 Whether the costs order nisi should be varied to prevent the Tong funding defendants' costs
- 3 Whether minority members can be required to subsidise litigation initiated or defended by managers following a majority view
Ratio Decidendi
Extension of time to apply to vary the costs order nisi was granted and the costs order was varied: the 2nd defendant was ordered to pay the plaintiff's costs; the three defendants must bear their own defence costs and are prohibited from seeking or receiving any payment or subsidy from the Tong to indemnify their legal costs (including taxed costs for the 2nd defendant). The court held managers who followed a majority view without obtaining a Beddoe order or independent advice must bear the consequence and the minority should not be forced to subsidise litigation.
Court Disposition
Application granted in part: time extended; costs order nisi varied to prevent Tong funding of defendants' costs; 2nd defendant ordered to pay plaintiff's costs; 1st and 3rd defendants excused from liability to pay plaintiff's costs and the three defendants ordered not to seek or receive any payment or subsidy from...
Orders
- Extension of time granted to vary the costs order nisi
- The 2nd defendant (To Shui Tai) is ordered to pay the plaintiff's costs of the action
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment