KWONG IAN (HONG KONG) CONSTRUCTION AND REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT CO LTD v. GLORIOUS SUN (HIGHWAY DEVELOPMENT LTD) AND OTHERS
The court allowed the 10th defendant's application and struck out the words 'and on behalf of Lucky Money Limited' because allowing Lucky Money to be described as part of the plaintiff while also being the 10th defendant was inappropriate, the alteration did not affect the merits, and there were no other shareholders not already parties; accordingly costs were ordered against Kwong Ian (Hong Kong) Construction and Real Estate Development Company Limited.
- Citation
- KWONG IAN (HONG KONG) CONSTRUCTION AND REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT CO LTD v. GLORIOUS SUN (HIGHWAY DEVELOPMENT LTD) AND OTHERS
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Plaintiff; Plaintiff (named Part): Kwong Ian (Hong Kong) Construction and Real Estate Development Company Limited; 10th Defendant: Lucky Money Limited; Defendants: 1st-3rd Defendants; Defendants: 4th-9th Defendants
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 9 August 2006
- Case Number
- HCA262/2006
- Procedural Posture
- Derivative Action / Interlocutory Application to Strike Out Part of Plaintiff's Title
- Outcome
- Application granted in part; specified words struck out; costs ordered against Kwong Ian (Hong Kong) Construction and Real Estate Development Company Limited; same orders for HCA261 and HCA262 of 2006.
- Legal Topics
- Derivative Action, Striking Out Description of Parties, Party Representation, Interlocutory Costs
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Plaintiff
Plaintiff
Kwong Ian (Hong Kong) Construction and Real Estate Development Company Limited
Plaintiff (named Part)
Lucky Money Limited
10th Defendant
1st-3rd Defendants
Defendants
4th-9th Defendants
Defendants
Procedural Posture
Derivative Action / Interlocutory Application to Strike Out Part of Plaintiff's Title
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the phrase 'and on behalf of Lucky Money Limited' should be struck out from the plaintiff's title
- 2 Whether a party can be described as both plaintiff and defendant in the same action
- 3 Whether costs should be ordered against the party that resisted the striking out application
Ratio Decidendi
The court allowed the 10th defendant's application and struck out the words 'and on behalf of Lucky Money Limited' because allowing Lucky Money to be described as part of the plaintiff while also being the 10th defendant was inappropriate, the alteration did not affect the merits, and there were no other shareholders not already parties; accordingly costs were ordered against Kwong Ian (Hong Kong) Construction and Real Estate Development Company Limited.
Court Disposition
Application granted in part; specified words struck out; costs ordered against Kwong Ian (Hong Kong) Construction and Real Estate Development Company Limited; same orders for HCA261 and HCA262 of 2006.
Orders
- Strike out the words 'and on behalf of Lucky Money Limited' from the title of the plaintiff.
- Costs of the application to be paid by Kwong Ian (Hong Kong) Construction and Real Estate Development Company Limited to the 10th defendant; costs to be taxed and paid forthwith.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment