CY FOUNDATION GROUP LTD v. CHENG CHEE TOCK THEODORE AND OTHERS
Funds paid into an overdrawn bank account cannot be traced so no proprietary right capable of protection existed; therefore the injunction application failed and costs follow the event. There were no special circumstances to justify varying the costs nisi or apportioning costs differently.
- Citation
- CY FOUNDATION GROUP LTD v. CHENG CHEE TOCK THEODORE AND OTHERS
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Plaintiff; 1st Defendant: 1st Defendant; 2nd Defendant: 2nd Defendant; 3rd Defendant: 3rd Defendant; 5th Defendant: 5th Defendant
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 22 May 2012
- Case Number
- HCMP680/2011
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Injunction (proprietary Claim / Tracing) / Decision on Costs Following Dismissal of Injunction Application
- Outcome
- Application to vary the costs order nisi dismissed; original costs order nisi upheld.
- Legal Topics
- Interlocutory Injunction, Proprietary Claim, Tracing, Overdrawn Bank Account, Variation of Costs Nisi, Party and Party Costs
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Plaintiff
Plaintiff
1st Defendant
1st Defendant
2nd Defendant
2nd Defendant
3rd Defendant
3rd Defendant
5th Defendant
5th Defendant
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Injunction (proprietary Claim / Tracing) / Decision on Costs Following Dismissal of Injunction Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether funds paid into an overdrawn account can be subject to a proprietary claim capable of being traced
- 2 Whether the costs order nisi should be varied to split costs before and after disclosure of the overdrawn account
- 3 Whether special circumstances exist to depart from the usual rule that costs follow the event
Ratio Decidendi
Funds paid into an overdrawn bank account cannot be traced so no proprietary right capable of protection existed; therefore the injunction application failed and costs follow the event. There were no special circumstances to justify varying the costs nisi or apportioning costs differently.
Court Disposition
Application to vary the costs order nisi dismissed; original costs order nisi upheld.
Orders
- Application to vary costs order nisi dismissed
- Costs of the injunction application to be paid by the Plaintiff to the Defendants, to be taxed on the party and party basis if not agreed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment