CHAN YU CHAU v. FONG ON CONSTRUCTION & ENGINEERING CO. LTD.
On the balance of probabilities the 1st Defendant breached Reg 10(4) by failing to provide an easily adjustable crown guard that extended as low as practicable and breached Reg 6 by not ensuring the floor was kept free of debris so far as practicable; the 2nd Defendant (employer) was responsible for providing the unsafe saw and permitting a hazardous system of work; those breaches caused the Plaintiff's injury. Plaintiff was contributorily negligent to the extent of 15%. Damages were assessed, statutory compensation deducted, and liability apportioned 25% to 1st Defendant and 75% to 2nd Defendant.
- Citation
- CHAN YU CHAU v. FONG ON CONSTRUCTION & ENGINEERING CO. LTD.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Plaintiff; 1st Defendant (principal Contractor): Fong On Construction and Engineering Co. Ltd; 2nd Defendant (subcontractor / Employer): Yeung Kin Kong (estate represented by Yeung Kim Ho); Intervenor: Employees Compensation Assistance Fund Board
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 4 June 2002
- Case Number
- HCPI753/2000
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury (industrial Accident) / Judgment at Trial
- Outcome
- Judgment for Plaintiff against both Defendants in the sum of $981,145 (after deduction of Employees Compensation), with interest and apportioned liability
- Legal Topics
- Negligence, Breach of Statutory Duty (machine Guarding and Site Cleanliness), Contributory Negligence, Quantum of Damages, Apportionment of Liability
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Plaintiff
Plaintiff
Fong On Construction and Engineering Co. Ltd
1st Defendant (principal Contractor)
Yeung Kin Kong (estate represented by Yeung Kim Ho)
2nd Defendant (subcontractor / Employer)
Employees Compensation Assistance Fund Board
Intervenor
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury (industrial Accident) / Judgment at Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether 1st Defendant breached Reg 10(4) (guarding of circular saw) of the Woodworking Machinery Regulations
- 2 Whether 1st Defendant breached Reg 6 (floor maintenance) of the Woodworking Machinery Regulations
- 3 Whether 2nd Defendant (employer/subcontractor) breached duties in supplying unsafe equipment and unsafe system of work
Ratio Decidendi
On the balance of probabilities the 1st Defendant breached Reg 10(4) by failing to provide an easily adjustable crown guard that extended as low as practicable and breached Reg 6 by not ensuring the floor was kept free of debris so far as practicable; the 2nd Defendant (employer) was responsible for providing the unsafe saw and permitting a hazardous system of work; those breaches caused the Plaintiff's injury. Plaintiff was contributorily negligent to the extent of 15%. Damages were assessed, statutory compensation deducted, and liability apportioned 25% to 1st Defendant and 75% to 2nd Defendant.
Court Disposition
Judgment for Plaintiff against both Defendants in the sum of $981,145 (after deduction of Employees Compensation), with interest and apportioned liability
Orders
- Judgment awarded to Plaintiff in the sum of HKD 981,145
- Interest on general damages at 2% per annum from date of writ to judgment and on special damages at half judgment rate from date of accident to date of judgment, after deduction of any interest paid in respect of Employees Compensation; post-judgment interest at judgment rate until payment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment