BRISILVER INVESTMENT LTD. v. WONG CHO MUI
The Court has jurisdiction under the Partition Ordinance to order a sale of the suit property even though part is owned by a tso; in the absence of evidence that customary prohibitions extend to outsiders, unanimous consent of tso members is not required to bar a court-ordered sale; section 15 NTO applies to disposals by a tso manager and does not prevent a court from ordering sale without the Secretary for Home Affairs' consent.
- Citation
- BRISILVER INVESTMENT LTD. v. WONG CHO MUI
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Plaintiff; 1st Defendant (one Third Co Owner): 1st Defendant
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 4 July 2000
- Case Number
- HCMP2038/1997
- Procedural Posture
- Partition Action Under Partition Ordinance (cap. 352) / Interlocutory Determination on Jurisdiction and Consent Issues (pre Trial Application)
- Outcome
- Application allowed; both issues answered in favour of the Plaintiff; Plaintiff entitled to costs of the application
- Legal Topics
- Partition, Order for Sale, Tso (clan) Land, Chinese Customary Law, Jurisdiction, Consent of Secretary for Home Affairs, Unanimous Consent of Tso Members, Article 40 Basic Law
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Plaintiff
Plaintiff
1st Defendant
1st Defendant (one Third Co Owner)
Procedural Posture
Partition Action Under Partition Ordinance (cap. 352) / Interlocutory Determination on Jurisdiction and Consent Issues (pre Trial Application)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Court has jurisdiction under the Partition Ordinance (Cap. 352) to order sale of property partly owned by a tso given the New Territories Ordinance (Cap. 97) and Article 40 Basic Law
- 2 Whether the Court may order such a sale in the absence of consent of the registered manager under s.15 NTO, unanimous consent of all tso members, and/or consent of the Secretary for Home Affairs
Ratio Decidendi
The Court has jurisdiction under the Partition Ordinance to order a sale of the suit property even though part is owned by a tso; in the absence of evidence that customary prohibitions extend to outsiders, unanimous consent of tso members is not required to bar a court-ordered sale; section 15 NTO applies to disposals by a tso manager and does not prevent a court from ordering sale without the Secretary for Home Affairs' consent.
Court Disposition
Application allowed; both issues answered in favour of the Plaintiff; Plaintiff entitled to costs of the application
Orders
- Both the jurisdiction issue and the consent requirement issue answered in the affirmative in favour of the Plaintiff
- The costs of this application are to be paid by the Defendants to the Plaintiff
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment