THOUSAND TREASURE INVESTMENT LTD v. PINKTON LTD
The defendant failed to prove 12 years of uninterrupted adverse possession because the trial judge preferred the plaintiff's independent witnesses over the defendant's witness; therefore the application for leave to appeal had no realistic prospect of success and was refused.
- Citation
- THOUSAND TREASURE INVESTMENT LTD v. PINKTON LTD
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Plaintiff; Defendant: Defendant
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 18 January 2010
- Case Number
- DCCJ3540/2006
- Procedural Posture
- Possession Adverse Possession / Leave to Appeal (post Trial)
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal refused; application for stay of execution refused; costs awarded to the plaintiff.
- Legal Topics
- Adverse Possession, Possession Claim, Leave to Appeal, Assessment of Witness Credibility
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Plaintiff
Plaintiff
Defendant
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Possession Adverse Possession / Leave to Appeal (post Trial)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant established 12 years of uninterrupted adverse possession
- 2 Whether an adverse inference should be drawn from the plaintiff's failure to call the former owner or former owner's solicitors
- 3 Credibility assessment of competing witness evidence
Ratio Decidendi
The defendant failed to prove 12 years of uninterrupted adverse possession because the trial judge preferred the plaintiff's independent witnesses over the defendant's witness; therefore the application for leave to appeal had no realistic prospect of success and was refused.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal refused; application for stay of execution refused; costs awarded to the plaintiff.
Orders
- Leave to appeal refused
- Stay of execution refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment