LIU SAU YING v. THE PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES OF CHUNG LOI SHAU Deceased

LIU SAU YING v. THE PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES OF CHUNG LOI SHAU Deceased

Because the plaintiff's affirmation was unopposed and accepted by the judge and the defendant did not appear or oppose, judgment was entered in terms of the summons under Rule 7, Order 19.

Citation
LIU SAU YING v. THE PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES OF CHUNG LOI SHAU Deceased
Parties
Plaintiff: Plaintiff; Defendant: Defendant
Court
District Court
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
21 July 2011
Case Number
DCCJ2326/2010
Procedural Posture
District Court Civil Proceeding — Application for Judgment Under Rule 7, Order 19 / Decision on Application for Judgment
Outcome
Application granted; judgment entered in terms of the summons.
Legal Topics
Default Judgment, Rule 7 Order 19, Unopposed Affirmation
Source Language
EN
Civil Procedure District Court Judgment Default Judgment Rule 7 Order 19 Unopposed Affirmation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Plaintiff

Plaintiff

Defendant

Defendant

Procedural Posture

District Court Civil Proceeding — Application for Judgment Under Rule 7, Order 19 / Decision on Application for Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether judgment should be entered under Rule 7, Order 19 of the Rules of the District Court based on the plaintiff's unopposed affirmation and the defendant's absence

Ratio Decidendi

Because the plaintiff's affirmation was unopposed and accepted by the judge and the defendant did not appear or oppose, judgment was entered in terms of the summons under Rule 7, Order 19.

Court Disposition

Application granted; judgment entered in terms of the summons.

Orders

  • Judgment entered in terms of the summons.