MUHAMMAD ISMAIL v. OR WAH
Liability was established by interlocutory judgment because the defendant failed to file a notice of intention to defend; quantum was determined by the judge on the evidence and by reference to comparable authorities, resulting in an award of damages totaling $358,706.34 less credit for ECC of $109,192.39, yielding...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- MUHAMMAD ISMAIL v. OR WAH
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Plaintiff; Defendant: Defendant
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 24 December 2003
- Case Number
- DCPI293/2003
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury Workplace Accident; Damages Assessment / Assessment of Damages Following Interlocutory Judgment for Want of Defence; Final Judgment on Quantum
- Outcome
- Judgment for the Plaintiff in the sum of $249,513.95; costs to the Plaintiff; Plaintiff's own costs to be taxed in accordance with Legal Aid Regulations.
- Legal Topics
- Pain and Suffering (psla), Loss of Earnings, Future Loss of Earnings, Interest on Damages, Medical Expenses, Credit for Statutory Compensation/ecc
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Plaintiff
Plaintiff
Defendant
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury Workplace Accident; Damages Assessment / Assessment of Damages Following Interlocutory Judgment for Want of Defence; Final Judgment on Quantum
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether and how much to award PSLA for ankle and wrist injuries
- 2 Calculation of past and future loss of earnings and MPF contributions
- 3 Appropriate interest to be awarded on different heads
Ratio Decidendi
Liability was established by interlocutory judgment because the defendant failed to file a notice of intention to defend; quantum was determined by the judge on the evidence and by reference to comparable authorities, resulting in an award of damages totaling $358,706.34 less credit for ECC of $109,192.39, yielding final judgment for $249,513.95 together with costs to the plaintiff.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the Plaintiff in the sum of $249,513.95; costs to the Plaintiff; Plaintiff's own costs to be taxed in accordance with Legal Aid Regulations.
Orders
- Judgment for the Plaintiff for $249,513.95.
- Costs awarded to the Plaintiff.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment