LEUNG WAI IP v. CHAN MING FAI

LEUNG WAI IP v. CHAN MING FAI

On the balance of probabilities the court found the defendant occupied with the plaintiff's permission in return for paying mortgage installments and other expenses; the defendant failed to prove the requisite intention for adverse possession and failed to establish any proprietary equitable interest; accordingly...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
LEUNG WAI IP v. CHAN MING FAI
Parties
Plaintiff: Plaintiff; Defendant: Defendant
Court
District Court
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
9 May 2016
Case Number
DCCJ677/2014
Procedural Posture
Civil Property (possession, Mesne Profits, Proprietary/title Claims) / Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for plaintiff; defendant's counterclaim dismissed
Legal Topics
Adverse Possession, Constructive Trust, Resulting Trust, Proprietary Estoppel, Mesne Profits, Illegal Alienation Under Housing Ordinance S17 B
Source Language
en
Property Law Trusts and Equitable Remedies Statutory Housing Law Limitation Law Adverse Possession Constructive Trust Resulting Trust Proprietary Estoppel +2 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Plaintiff

Plaintiff

Defendant

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Property (possession, Mesne Profits, Proprietary/title Claims) / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 What was the parties' common intention regarding the Property
  2. 2 What legal relationship was created or maintained between the parties (license/tenancy/ownership)
  3. 3 Whether defendant established title by adverse possession

Ratio Decidendi

On the balance of probabilities the court found the defendant occupied with the plaintiff's permission in return for paying mortgage installments and other expenses; the defendant failed to prove the requisite intention for adverse possession and failed to establish any proprietary equitable interest; accordingly plaintiff's claim for possession succeeded and defendant's counterclaim was dismissed.

Court Disposition

Judgment for plaintiff; defendant's counterclaim dismissed

Orders

  • Defendant to deliver vacant possession of the Property to the plaintiff
  • Defendant to pay mesne profits at HK$5,690 per month from 19 June 2013 until vacant possession is delivered to the plaintiff