劉愛娣 v. 干淑敏
Although the default judgment was regular because of valid service by ordinary post, the defendant demonstrated a meritorious defence with a real prospect of success based on her account and Labour Tribunal materials; accordingly the appeal is allowed and the default judgment of 27 November 2013 is set aside, with specified costs directions.
- Citation
- 劉愛娣 v. 干淑敏
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Plaintiff; Defendant: Defendant
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 31 July 2014
- Case Number
- DCCJ4234/2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal Against Refusal to Set Aside Default Judgment / Appeal Hearing (district Court)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; default judgment dated 27 November 2013 set aside
- Legal Topics
- Default Judgment, Service of Process, Setting Aside Judgment, Meritorious Defence, Res Judicata, Set Off, Costs
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Plaintiff
Plaintiff
Defendant
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal Against Refusal to Set Aside Default Judgment / Appeal Hearing (district Court)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the default judgment was regular
- 2 Whether service by ordinary post was valid
- 3 Whether the defendant has a meritorious defence with a real prospect of success to set aside a regularly entered default judgment
Ratio Decidendi
Although the default judgment was regular because of valid service by ordinary post, the defendant demonstrated a meritorious defence with a real prospect of success based on her account and Labour Tribunal materials; accordingly the appeal is allowed and the default judgment of 27 November 2013 is set aside, with specified costs directions.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; default judgment dated 27 November 2013 set aside
Orders
- Default judgment entered on 27 November 2013 set aside
- Costs order made by the master on that occasion not disturbed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment