CHAN SAU LAN v. CHESTERTON PETTY LTD

CHAN SAU LAN v. CHESTERTON PETTY LTD

Because the central issue is psychiatric and post‑concussional syndrome is not established as a recognised disorder without appropriate psychiatric expert evidence, the trial must be adjourned and the court directs specific expert examinations and reciprocal exchange of reports to permit proper resolution.

Citation
CHAN SAU LAN v. CHESTERTON PETTY LTD
Parties
Plaintiff: Plaintiff; Defendant: Defendant
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
27 February 2004
Case Number
HCPI1123/2002
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury / Trial Adjourned for Further Psychiatric Expert Evidence
Outcome
Trial adjourned; directions given for further psychiatric and medical expert evidence and reciprocal disclosure.
Legal Topics
Post Concussional Syndrome, Psychiatric Expert Reports, Exchange of Medical Reports, DSM IV Relevance, Trial Adjournment
Source Language
EN
Personal Injury Medical/psychiatric Evidence Civil Procedure Post Concussional Syndrome Psychiatric Expert Reports Exchange of Medical Reports DSM IV Relevance Trial Adjournment

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Plaintiff

Plaintiff

Defendant

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Personal Injury / Trial Adjourned for Further Psychiatric Expert Evidence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff suffers from post-concussional syndrome
  2. 2 Whether post-concussional syndrome is a sufficiently recognised disorder to ground compensation
  3. 3 Whether proper psychiatric expert evidence has been obtained and exchanged

Ratio Decidendi

Because the central issue is psychiatric and post‑concussional syndrome is not established as a recognised disorder without appropriate psychiatric expert evidence, the trial must be adjourned and the court directs specific expert examinations and reciprocal exchange of reports to permit proper resolution.

Court Disposition

Trial adjourned; directions given for further psychiatric and medical expert evidence and reciprocal disclosure.

Orders

  • Trial adjourned to a date to be fixed
  • Plaintiff may call Dr Leung and, if desired, Dr Fung Ching Fai for examination and cross-examination