LAU WING YEUNG v. KOWLOON CRICKET CLUB

LAU WING YEUNG v. KOWLOON CRICKET CLUB

The court held that documents in DCPI 2491/2012 and bank transaction records that bear on the plaintiff's earnings, sick leave and funds received are relevant to causation and apportionment of loss of earnings and thus specific discovery is ordered as amended; discovery of the wife's general employment records is refused but her bank transaction records that show transfers to the plaintiff are ordered; no supplemental expert report was required; the plaintiff may serve a supplemental witness statement but the application to file a re-revised statement of damages is dismissed as premature; costs allocated as ordered.

Citation
LAU WING YEUNG v. KOWLOON CRICKET CLUB
Parties
Plaintiff: Plaintiff; Defendant: Defendant; Spouse/non Party Subject to Summons: Chan Wai Hing
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
16 April 2014
Case Number
HCPI955/2013
Procedural Posture
Civil Personal Injury (interlocutory Discovery) / Interlocutory (chambers Applications for Specific Discovery and Amendment)
Outcome
First Summons granted in part as amended, Second Summons granted in part, Third Summons granted in part (supplemental witness statement allowed) and plaintiff's application to file a re-revised Statement of Damages dismissed as premature; costs allocated as ordered.
Legal Topics
Specific Discovery, Discovery Against Non Party (order 24 Rule 7 A), Relevance Test for Discovery, Apportionment of Damages, Causation, Expert Evidence, Amendment of Statement of Damages
Source Language
EN

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Plaintiff

Plaintiff

Defendant

Defendant

Chan Wai Hing

Spouse/non Party Subject to Summons

Procedural Posture

Civil Personal Injury (interlocutory Discovery) / Interlocutory (chambers Applications for Specific Discovery and Amendment)

  1. 1 Whether documents in separate personal injury action DCPI 2491/2012 are relevant for discovery in current action
  2. 2 Whether specific discovery should be ordered against the plaintiff's wife (non-party)
  3. 3 Whether bank records and earnings documents are within plaintiff's possession custody or power and therefore discoverable

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that documents in DCPI 2491/2012 and bank transaction records that bear on the plaintiff's earnings, sick leave and funds received are relevant to causation and apportionment of loss of earnings and thus specific discovery is ordered as amended; discovery of the wife's general employment records is refused but her bank transaction records that show transfers to the plaintiff are ordered; no supplemental expert report was required; the plaintiff may serve a supplemental witness statement but the application to file a re-revised statement of damages is dismissed as premature; costs allocated as ordered.

Court Disposition

First Summons granted in part as amended, Second Summons granted in part, Third Summons granted in part (supplemental witness statement allowed) and plaintiff's application to file a re-revised Statement of Damages dismissed as premature; costs allocated as ordered.

Orders

  • First Summons: specific discovery in amended terms limited to: (i) Statement of Claim and Revised Statement of Claim (if any) filed in DCPI 2491/2012; (ii) medical reports and documents concerning the Plaintiff's earnings filed in DCPI 2491/2012 pursuant to PD18.1; (iii) medical expert reports in DCPI 2491/2012;...
  • Second Summons: order in terms of paragraphs 1 and 2 and the Schedule save as to delete paragraph (a) seeking the wife's employment records and earnings; allow discovery of the wife's bank transaction records showing transfers to the plaintiff.