GOLD CHANNEL HOLDINGS LTD. v. LAPAGAYO (ASIA PACIFIC) LTD.

GOLD CHANNEL HOLDINGS LTD. v. LAPAGAYO (ASIA PACIFIC) LTD.

The cause of action on the cheque accrued on presentation and dishonour after 1 December 2001 and therefore arose after the earlier writ; under s.35 it is a separate action. There was no arguable defence, the cheque was supported by consideration and no fraud was alleged; in cheque actions set‑off/counterclaim is generally not permitted. Consequently summary judgment was appropriate for the Plaintiff for the cheque amount with interest and costs.

Citation
GOLD CHANNEL HOLDINGS LTD. v. LAPAGAYO (ASIA PACIFIC) LTD.
Parties
Plaintiff: Plaintiff; Defendant: Defendant
Court
District Court
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
16 May 2002
Case Number
DCCJ22360/2001
Procedural Posture
Summary Judgment Under Order 14 / Judgment on Summons for Summary Judgment
Outcome
Summary judgment for Plaintiff in the sum of HK$229,499.10
Legal Topics
Summary Judgment, Dishonoured Cheque, Set Off and Counterclaim, Abuse of Process, Limitation of Actions
Source Language
EN
Civil Procedure Negotiable Instruments Contract Law Limitation Summary Judgment Dishonoured Cheque Set Off and Counterclaim Abuse of Process +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Plaintiff

Plaintiff

Defendant

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Summary Judgment Under Order 14 / Judgment on Summons for Summary Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the cheque action was an abuse of process because it should have been counter‑claimed in an earlier action
  2. 2 Whether the claim on the dishonoured cheque constitutes a separate action under Limitation Ordinance s.35
  3. 3 Whether set-off or counterclaim is permissible in an action on a dishonoured cheque

Ratio Decidendi

The cause of action on the cheque accrued on presentation and dishonour after 1 December 2001 and therefore arose after the earlier writ; under s.35 it is a separate action. There was no arguable defence, the cheque was supported by consideration and no fraud was alleged; in cheque actions set‑off/counterclaim is generally not permitted. Consequently summary judgment was appropriate for the Plaintiff for the cheque amount with interest and costs.

Court Disposition

Summary judgment for Plaintiff in the sum of HK$229,499.10

Orders

  • Judgment for the Plaintiff in the sum of HK$229,499.10
  • Interest from 1 December 2001 until judgment and thereafter at judgment rate until payment