LAM PING v. ZI YAN LU
The court was satisfied beyond reasonable doubt under s5(2) that the 2002 Will embodies the Deceased's testamentary intentions because of coherent explanatory evidence and credible attesting witness testimony, the Defendant failed to discharge the evidential burden to show forgery or invalidity, and therefore the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- LAM PING v. ZI YAN LU
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Plaintiff; Defendant: ZI YAN LU
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 31 March 2010
- Case Number
- HCAP13/2004
- Procedural Posture
- Probate Claim / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- 2002 Will pronounced valid and given force and validity in solemn form; caveat vacated
- Legal Topics
- Validity of Will, Authenticity/forgery Challenge, Testamentary Capacity, Execution Formalities (s5), Burden of Proof, Costs and Caveat
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Plaintiff
Plaintiff
ZI YAN LU
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Probate Claim / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 2002 document is a valid will
- 2 Whether the 2002 Will was duly executed given only one attesting witness
- 3 Whether the 2002 Will is authentic or forged
Ratio Decidendi
The court was satisfied beyond reasonable doubt under s5(2) that the 2002 Will embodies the Deceased's testamentary intentions because of coherent explanatory evidence and credible attesting witness testimony, the Defendant failed to discharge the evidential burden to show forgery or invalidity, and therefore the 2002 Will is valid despite non-compliance with s5(1).
Court Disposition
2002 Will pronounced valid and given force and validity in solemn form; caveat vacated
Orders
- The caveat filed by the Defendant is vacated
- Plaintiff to apply to the Probate Registry for grant of letters of administration and comply with usual requirements including minority interests
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment