POLYLINE DEVELOPMENT LTD (in liquidation) v. CHING LIN CHUEN AND OTHERS
s.905 Companies Ordinance was engaged because the plaintiff in liquidation and its third party funder would not meet adverse costs; the court should exercise its discretion to order security because the merits were not so strong as to preclude an order and ordering security would not unreasonably stifle the action; on a broad‑brush assessment the just sum to secure defendants' costs to discovery was HK$2.8 million; proceedings stayed until payment and dismissal ordered on default.
- Citation
- [2023] HKCFI 3049
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Polyline Development Limited; 1st Defendant: Ching Lin Chuen; 2nd Defendant: Personal Representative of the late Tam Shui; 3rd Defendant: Chan Yung Yu Jacky; 4th Defendant: Cheng Yee Cheong; 5th Defendant: Chan Yung Heng Henry; 6th Defendant: Han Xiu Yan; 7th Defendant: Chan King; 8th Defendant: Ching Ka Hung; 9th Defendant: Cheung Hing Loi; 10th Defendant: Cheung Bik Fong; 11th Defendant: Lo Sam Shing; 12th Defendant: Polyline International Group Limited; 13th Defendant: Gainable International Limited; 14th Defendant: Bondfield Development Limited; 15th Defendant: Sunfair Corporation Limited; 16th Defendant: Chings Enterprises Limited; 17th Defendant: Grand Luck Limited; 18th Defendant: Hong Kong Weidong Real Estate Limited
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 28 November 2023
- Case Number
- HCA2319/2019
- Procedural Posture
- Companies Ordinance S.905 Security for Costs Application / Interlocutory — Security for Costs Hearing (pre Discovery)
- Outcome
- Security for costs ordered pursuant to s.905 Companies Ordinance
- Legal Topics
- Security for Costs, Fiduciary Duties, Fraudulent Transfer, Third Party Litigation Funding, Limitation, Striking Out
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Polyline Development Limited
Plaintiff
Ching Lin Chuen
1st Defendant
Personal Representative of the late Tam Shui
2nd Defendant
Chan Yung Yu Jacky
3rd Defendant
Cheng Yee Cheong
4th Defendant
Chan Yung Heng Henry
5th Defendant
Han Xiu Yan
6th Defendant
Chan King
7th Defendant
Ching Ka Hung
8th Defendant
Cheung Hing Loi
9th Defendant
Cheung Bik Fong
10th Defendant
Lo Sam Shing
11th Defendant
Polyline International Group Limited
12th Defendant
Gainable International Limited
13th Defendant
Bondfield Development Limited
14th Defendant
Sunfair Corporation Limited
15th Defendant
Chings Enterprises Limited
16th Defendant
Grand Luck Limited
17th Defendant
Hong Kong Weidong Real Estate Limited
18th Defendant
Procedural Posture
Companies Ordinance S.905 Security for Costs Application / Interlocutory — Security for Costs Hearing (pre Discovery)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether s.905 Companies Ordinance applies and security should be ordered
- 2 Whether the Plaintiff's impecuniosity is caused by the Defendants' alleged wrongdoing
- 3 Whether the merits of the Plaintiff's case are so strong as to defeat an order for security
Ratio Decidendi
s.905 Companies Ordinance was engaged because the plaintiff in liquidation and its third party funder would not meet adverse costs; the court should exercise its discretion to order security because the merits were not so strong as to preclude an order and ordering security would not unreasonably stifle the action; on a broad‑brush assessment the just sum to secure defendants' costs to discovery was HK$2.8 million; proceedings stayed until payment and dismissal ordered on default.
Court Disposition
Security for costs ordered pursuant to s.905 Companies Ordinance
Orders
- Plaintiff to provide security of HK$2,800,000 for Applicant defendants' costs up to discovery by payment into court within 28 days or such extended period agreed by parties
- All proceedings stayed pending provision of the security
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment