KO KWOK KUE AND ANOTHER v. CHING TAT LOONG AND OTHERS
Plaintiffs are entitled to possession of Lot 67 and to erect a fence; the 10th Defendant has no right of way over Lot 67 and is liable for trespass; an injunction is appropriate to prevent repeated trespass; damages for loss of use are properly assessed by rental value of the land occupied and interest and costs are awarded as adjusted by the court.
- Citation
- KO KWOK KUE AND ANOTHER v. CHING TAT LOONG AND OTHERS
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: KO KWOK KUE; 2nd Plaintiff: RECKON ENTERPRISES (HONG KONG) LIMITED; 1st Defendant: CHING TAT LOONG; 2nd Defendant: YAU CHI HUNG; 3rd Defendant: CHOI MAY LUN; 4th Defendant: YAU LIN TAI; 5th Defendant: SHIU YUNG HO; 6th Defendant: YAU WAI WING; 7th Defendant: YAU KAI CHEONG; 8th Defendant: YAU SUI YAU; 9th Defendant: LINKEN RANGE CO. LTD.; 10th Defendant: LUK MAN FOON; 11th Defendant: YAU HOI YUNG; 12th Defendant: YAU KOON WAN; 13th Defendant: YEUNG AN NIE; 14th Defendant: MAK TING FAY; 15th Defendant: CHIU HUNG and IP YIP LING; 16th Defendant: FUNG HING LUN; 17th Defendant: LAI KWOK HO AND FAN MUI CHING
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 3 February 1989
- Case Number
- HCA4586/1987
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Land Dispute (possession, Trespass, Right of Way, Injunction) / Trial Judgment Delivered
- Outcome
- Judgment for Plaintiffs against the 10th Defendant; 10th Defendant's counterclaim dismissed; declarations, injunction, damages, interest and costs ordered in favour of Plaintiffs.
- Legal Topics
- Possession, Right of Way, Easement, Injunction, Declaration, Damages, Interest, Costs Allocation
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
KO KWOK KUE
1st Plaintiff
RECKON ENTERPRISES (HONG KONG) LIMITED
2nd Plaintiff
CHING TAT LOONG
1st Defendant
YAU CHI HUNG
2nd Defendant
CHOI MAY LUN
3rd Defendant
YAU LIN TAI
4th Defendant
SHIU YUNG HO
5th Defendant
YAU WAI WING
6th Defendant
YAU KAI CHEONG
7th Defendant
YAU SUI YAU
8th Defendant
LINKEN RANGE CO. LTD.
9th Defendant
LUK MAN FOON
10th Defendant
YAU HOI YUNG
11th Defendant
YAU KOON WAN
12th Defendant
YEUNG AN NIE
13th Defendant
MAK TING FAY
14th Defendant
CHIU HUNG and IP YIP LING
15th Defendant
FUNG HING LUN
16th Defendant
LAI KWOK HO AND FAN MUI CHING
17th Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Land Dispute (possession, Trespass, Right of Way, Injunction) / Trial Judgment Delivered
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Plaintiffs are entitled to possession of Lot 67 and to erect a fence
- 2 Whether the 10th Defendant (and others) have a legal right of way or easement over Lot 67
- 3 Whether the access road had been dedicated as a public highway
Ratio Decidendi
Plaintiffs are entitled to possession of Lot 67 and to erect a fence; the 10th Defendant has no right of way over Lot 67 and is liable for trespass; an injunction is appropriate to prevent repeated trespass; damages for loss of use are properly assessed by rental value of the land occupied and interest and costs are awarded as adjusted by the court.
Court Disposition
Judgment for Plaintiffs against the 10th Defendant; 10th Defendant's counterclaim dismissed; declarations, injunction, damages, interest and costs ordered in favour of Plaintiffs.
Orders
- Declaration that the 10th Defendant and his servants and agents are not entitled to enter or cross Lot 67 (the Plaintiffs' land)
- Declaration that the 2nd Plaintiff is entitled to erect a fence along the boundary of Lot 67 to prevent entry or crossing by the 10th Defendant and his servants or agents
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment