CHAN KING CHANG AND ANOTHER v. 劉俊民 AND OTHERS
The court accepted the plaintiffs' evidence that they funded acquisition and construction and that the Deed of Gift of 23 June 1976 vested ownership of the whole house in the plaintiffs; there was no credible evidence of any binding agreement that the 4th defendant retained beneficial ownership of the ground floor or that the land would be re-transferred to the 4th defendant after the parents' deaths; accordingly the defendants' defences and the 4th defendant's counterclaim were dismissed and the plaintiffs were entitled to possession and specified monetary awards.
- Citation
- [2023] HKDC 1854
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: CHAN KING CHANG; 2nd Plaintiff: CHAN LAU KOON TAI ELAINE (formerly LAU KOON TAI); 1st Defendant: 劉俊民; 2nd Defendant: 劉卓軒; 3rd Defendant: The Occupier(s) of Ground Floor of Lot No. 776 in Demarcation District No. 225, Sai Kung, New Territories, Hong Kong; 4th Defendant: 劉俊民 (person appointed to represent the estate of 劉觀平, Deceased)
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 27 December 2023
- Case Number
- DCMP3166/2018
- Procedural Posture
- Summary Proceedings for Possession Under Order 113 of the Rules of the District Court (cap. 336 H) / Judgment After Trial (27 December 2023)
- Outcome
- Plaintiffs' claim for possession allowed against 1st–3rd defendants; defendants' defences and 4th defendant's counterclaim dismissed; limited monetary awards made to plaintiffs; costs orders nisi as specified.
- Legal Topics
- Possession, Deed of Gift, Licence, Constructive Trust, Resulting Trust, Trespass, Costs, Amendment of Pleadings
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CHAN KING CHANG
1st Plaintiff
CHAN LAU KOON TAI ELAINE (formerly LAU KOON TAI)
2nd Plaintiff
劉俊民
1st Defendant
劉卓軒
2nd Defendant
The Occupier(s) of Ground Floor of Lot No. 776 in Demarcation District No. 225, Sai Kung, New Territories, Hong Kong
3rd Defendant
劉俊民 (person appointed to represent the estate of 劉觀平, Deceased)
4th Defendant
Procedural Posture
Summary Proceedings for Possession Under Order 113 of the Rules of the District Court (cap. 336 H) / Judgment After Trial (27 December 2023)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an oral agreement existed between 1st plaintiff and 4th defendant allocating floors or creating beneficial ownership rights
- 2 Whether the Deed of Gift dated 23 June 1976 was valid or should be set aside
- 3 Whether there was an agreement to transfer the land back to the 4th defendant upon parents' death
Ratio Decidendi
The court accepted the plaintiffs' evidence that they funded acquisition and construction and that the Deed of Gift of 23 June 1976 vested ownership of the whole house in the plaintiffs; there was no credible evidence of any binding agreement that the 4th defendant retained beneficial ownership of the ground floor or that the land would be re-transferred to the 4th defendant after the parents' deaths; accordingly the defendants' defences and the 4th defendant's counterclaim were dismissed and the plaintiffs were entitled to possession and specified monetary awards.
Court Disposition
Plaintiffs' claim for possession allowed against 1st–3rd defendants; defendants' defences and 4th defendant's counterclaim dismissed; limited monetary awards made to plaintiffs; costs orders nisi as specified.
Orders
- Judgment for possession of the property in favour of the 1st and 2nd plaintiffs against the 1st, 2nd and 3rd defendants.
- Application by the 4th defendant to amend the re-amended defence and counterclaim dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment