Re GABRIEL RICARDO DIAS-AZEDO
The Funding Creditors' legal proceedings obtained without notice preserved assets for the benefit of the bankrupt's creditors within the meaning of s37(2); accordingly the court exercised its discretion to permit the Trustees to pay the Funding Creditors' legal costs incurred up to 23 March 2010 with the same priority as the petitioner's taxed costs, subject to party-and-party taxation and scrutiny by the Trustees.
- Citation
- Re GABRIEL RICARDO DIAS-AZEDO
- Parties
- Petitioner / Creditor: Angela Rita Gardner; Funding Creditors: Mr and Mrs Arthur Antonio Da Silva; Trustees of the Bankrupt's Estate: Joint and Several Trustees; Bankrupt: Gabriel Ricardo Dias-Azedo
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 7 October 2013
- Case Number
- HCB2212/2010
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy Proceedings / Hearing on Summons Under Section 37(2) and Section 97 for Priority of Creditor Incurred Legal Costs
- Outcome
- Application granted in part: Trustees permitted to pay Funding Creditors' legal costs incurred up to 23 March 2010 with same priority as taxed costs of the petition, subject to party-and-party taxation and agreement; liberty to apply; petitioner ordered to pay Funding Creditors' costs nisi; Trustees' costs payable...
- Legal Topics
- Priority of Costs, Section 37(2) Bankruptcy Ordinance, Section 97 Bankruptcy Ordinance, Funding Agreements, Mareva Injunctions and Freezing Orders, Taxation of Costs
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Angela Rita Gardner
Petitioner / Creditor
Mr and Mrs Arthur Antonio Da Silva
Funding Creditors
Joint and Several Trustees
Trustees of the Bankrupt's Estate
Gabriel Ricardo Dias-Azedo
Bankrupt
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Proceedings / Hearing on Summons Under Section 37(2) and Section 97 for Priority of Creditor Incurred Legal Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether legal proceedings brought by the Funding Creditors without notice preserved the bankrupt's property such that their costs can be paid with the same priority as the petitioner's taxed costs under s37(2)
- 2 Whether section 97 permits creation of a new priority where none exists under the Ordinance
- 3 Whether irregularity of the Funding Creditors' default judgment defeats an application under s37(2)
Ratio Decidendi
The Funding Creditors' legal proceedings obtained without notice preserved assets for the benefit of the bankrupt's creditors within the meaning of s37(2); accordingly the court exercised its discretion to permit the Trustees to pay the Funding Creditors' legal costs incurred up to 23 March 2010 with the same priority as the petitioner's taxed costs, subject to party-and-party taxation and scrutiny by the Trustees.
Court Disposition
Application granted in part: Trustees permitted to pay Funding Creditors' legal costs incurred up to 23 March 2010 with same priority as taxed costs of the petition, subject to party-and-party taxation and agreement; liberty to apply; petitioner ordered to pay Funding Creditors' costs nisi; Trustees' costs payable...
Orders
- Trustees permitted to pay Funding Creditors from the bankrupt's estate, with same priority as the petitioner's taxed costs, the Funding Creditors' legal costs incurred in Hong Kong and the United Kingdom in preserving the bankrupt's property up to 23 March 2010, such costs to be referred to a taxing master for...
- Liberty to apply
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment