CHAN GORDON v. LEE WAI HING AND ANOTHER
The court awarded the daughter full costs to be met from the father’s estate but limited resort to the estate's cash (bank savings), holding the disputed property excluded from the estate for costs purposes; the administrator was not entitled to indemnity out of the estate because he failed to obtain Beddoe-type authorization, adopted an inappropriate Order 113 procedure, acted unreasonably and placed his firm in conflict, and therefore his costs should not be borne by the estate; the court retained that, as a principle, costs of administration (and any administrator costs properly allowed) rank ahead of claimant costs, but made no indemnity order for the administrator and assessed...
- Citation
- CHAN GORDON v. LEE WAI HING AND ANOTHER
- Parties
- Plaintiff / Administrator: CHAN GORDON; Defendant / Daughter: LEE WAI HING; Potential Beneficiary: Wife; Potential Beneficiary: 5th Uncle
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 20 April 2011
- Case Number
- HCMP1596/2008
- Procedural Posture
- Administration / Proprietary Claim (order 113; Probate Administration) / Costs Hearing Following Judgment on Proprietary Estoppel and Constructive Trust (post Trial Costs Assessment)
- Outcome
- Costs judgment: daughter awarded full costs to be paid from the father’s estate cash (bank savings); the disputed property declared not part of the estate for costs; administrator not indemnified out of the estate for his own costs; stay of conveyance pending costs settlement; immediate assessment and order relating...
- Legal Topics
- Proprietary Estoppel, Constructive Trust, Donatio Mortis Causa, Beddoe Order (trustee Indemnity), Order 113 Procedure, Costs Priority, Mediation / ADR
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CHAN GORDON
Plaintiff / Administrator
LEE WAI HING
Defendant / Daughter
Wife
Potential Beneficiary
5th Uncle
Potential Beneficiary
Procedural Posture
Administration / Proprietary Claim (order 113; Probate Administration) / Costs Hearing Following Judgment on Proprietary Estoppel and Constructive Trust (post Trial Costs Assessment)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the daughter is entitled to full or only 50% of her costs
- 2 Whether the administrator's costs should be borne out of the estate
- 3 Whether the disputed property forms part of the estate for the purpose of settling costs
Ratio Decidendi
The court awarded the daughter full costs to be met from the father’s estate but limited resort to the estate's cash (bank savings), holding the disputed property excluded from the estate for costs purposes; the administrator was not entitled to indemnity out of the estate because he failed to obtain Beddoe-type authorization, adopted an inappropriate Order 113 procedure, acted unreasonably and placed his firm in conflict, and therefore his costs should not be borne by the estate; the court retained that, as a principle, costs of administration (and any administrator costs properly allowed) rank ahead of claimant costs, but made no indemnity order for the administrator and assessed...
Court Disposition
Costs judgment: daughter awarded full costs to be paid from the father’s estate cash (bank savings); the disputed property declared not part of the estate for costs; administrator not indemnified out of the estate for his own costs; stay of conveyance pending costs settlement; immediate assessment and order relating...
Orders
- Daughter to provide, within 21 days, an affirmation as to the assets of the father in her possession.
- There shall be a stay of the order under paragraph 95 of the earlier judgment (requiring the administrator to execute a conveyance of the property to the daughter) pending settlement of costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment