SINO FAVOUR DEVELOPMENT LTD AND ANOTHER v. KAN WAI MING AND OTHERS
None of the Defendants established an arguable proprietary interest in the $2.5 million held by the solicitors; the 2nd Defendant's asserted 50% interest was unparticularised and undermined by a signed waiver; allegations of illegality and fraud were irrelevant to the immediate question of entitlement to the stakeholder funds; accordingly the Plaintiffs' application for payment was allowed and partial judgment granted.
- Citation
- SINO FAVOUR DEVELOPMENT LTD AND ANOTHER v. KAN WAI MING AND OTHERS
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: Sino Favour Development Limited; 2nd Plaintiff: Shiny Develop Limited; 1st Defendant: Kan Wai Chung; 1st Defendant: Kan Kar Fai; 1st Defendant: Kan Wai Ming; 1st Defendant: Lau Fook Keung; 1st Defendant: Kan For Ping Steven; 2nd Defendant: Barbican Capital Investment Limited; 3rd Defendant: Tsang Wing Kei, Wilkie
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 1 September 2009
- Case Number
- HCA1519/2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil: Application for Distribution of Stakeholder Funds / Interlocutory Chambers Decision on Partial Judgment Under Order 14 (liberty to Apply)
- Outcome
- Plaintiffs' application allowed; partial judgment granted ordering payment of stakeholder funds to the Plaintiffs.
- Legal Topics
- Proprietary Interest, Stakeholder Funds, Partial Judgment, Illegality, Fraud
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sino Favour Development Limited
1st Plaintiff
Shiny Develop Limited
2nd Plaintiff
Kan Wai Chung
1st Defendant
Kan Kar Fai
1st Defendant
Kan Wai Ming
1st Defendant
Lau Fook Keung
1st Defendant
Kan For Ping Steven
1st Defendant
Barbican Capital Investment Limited
2nd Defendant
Tsang Wing Kei, Wilkie
3rd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil: Application for Distribution of Stakeholder Funds / Interlocutory Chambers Decision on Partial Judgment Under Order 14 (liberty to Apply)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether any Defendant has an arguable proprietary interest in the $2.5 million held by solicitors as stakeholder
- 2 Whether allegations of illegality affect the disposition of monies paid pursuant to a court order
- 3 Whether allegations of fraud prevent payment of stakeholder funds to Plaintiffs pending trial
Ratio Decidendi
None of the Defendants established an arguable proprietary interest in the $2.5 million held by the solicitors; the 2nd Defendant's asserted 50% interest was unparticularised and undermined by a signed waiver; allegations of illegality and fraud were irrelevant to the immediate question of entitlement to the stakeholder funds; accordingly the Plaintiffs' application for payment was allowed and partial judgment granted.
Court Disposition
Plaintiffs' application allowed; partial judgment granted ordering payment of stakeholder funds to the Plaintiffs.
Orders
- Plaintiffs' application allowed
- Solicitors holding $2,500,000 to pay the monies to the Plaintiffs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment