WANG HAIHONG AND OTHERS v. J.P. MORGAN SECURITIES (ASIA PACIFIC LTD) AND ANOTHER

WANG HAIHONG AND OTHERS v. J.P. MORGAN SECURITIES (ASIA PACIFIC LTD) AND ANOTHER

The court held that the plaintiffs' causes of action (common law and statutory) accrued when they acquired the shares because real and actual diminution in the intrinsic value of the shares occurred on acquisition due to false or misleading prospectus information; consequently the six‑year limitation ran from each purchase date and the claims issued in 2019 were time‑barred.

Citation
[2021] HKCFI 2840
Parties
1st Plaintiff: WANG HAIHONG (王海洪); 2nd Plaintiff: LIU HONG (劉紅); 3rd Plaintiff: WANG HAIYAN (王海燕); 4th Plaintiff: LIU XIANGFEI (劉湘飛); 5th Plaintiff: GU WENPING (谷文萍); 6h Plaintiff: ZHANG HANHUA (張含華); 7th Plaintiff: DONG CHENJING (董辰京); 8th Plaintiff: ZUO YING (左鶯); 9th Plaintiff: LIAO JIE (廖潔); 10th Plaintiff: ZHANG ZHENGFENG (張征峰); 11th Plaintiff: LIU YAN (劉雁); 12th Plaintiff: WANG HAN (汪涵); 13th Plaintiff: ZHOU XUAN (周宣); 14th Plaintiff: LI CHUANXIN (李傳新); 15th Plaintiff: ZHANG BIQIONG (張碧琼); 16th Plaintiff: MAO SHIHAI (毛世海) also known as MAO YIFENG (毛翊灃); 17th Plaintiff: LU PENGHU (盧澎湖); 18th Plaintiff: DAI LIYA (戴行亞); 19th Plaintiff: ZUO NING (左寧); 20th Plaintiff: GAO YALING (高雅玲); 21st Plaintiff: HUANG LIBO (黃麗波); 22nd Plaintiff: SUN YU YAN (孫宇燕); 23rd Plaintiff: ZHOU CHUNZIAO (周春曉); 24th Plaintiff: WEN WU (文武); 25th Plaintiff: TAN PENGCHENG (譚鵬程); 26th Plaintiff: ZHANG ZHENGBO (張正波); 27th Plaintiff: JU RUOXU (琚若圩) also known as QU RUOWEI (璩若圩); 28th Plaintiff: ZHOU MIN (周敏); 29th Plaintiff: YANG ZAIKUO (楊再擴); 30th Plaintiff: ZHANG YUXIU (張玉秀); 31st Plaintiff: WANG ZHIQI (王志琦); 32nd Plaintiff: YANG MING (楊明); 33rd Plaintiff: LEE SHING PUT (李聖發); 34th Plaintiff: CHAI LONG (柴隆); 35th Plaintiff: WANG HE (王賀); 1st Defendant: J.P. MORGAN SECURITIES (ASIA PACIFIC LIMITED); 2nd Defendant: DELOITTE TOUCHE TOHMATSU (a firm)
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
28 September 2021
Case Number
HCA344/2019
Procedural Posture
Civil: Prospectus Misrepresentation, Negligence and Statutory Claims by Shareholders / Chambers Decision on Striking Out Application (limitation)
Outcome
Plaintiffs' claims struck out as time‑barred and actions dismissed
Legal Topics
Prospectus Liability, Misrepresentation, Negligence, Market Misconduct, Statute of Limitations, Delisting
Source Language
EN

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

WANG HAIHONG (王海洪)

1st Plaintiff

LIU HONG (劉紅)

2nd Plaintiff

WANG HAIYAN (王海燕)

3rd Plaintiff

LIU XIANGFEI (劉湘飛)

4th Plaintiff

GU WENPING (谷文萍)

5th Plaintiff

ZHANG HANHUA (張含華)

6h Plaintiff

DONG CHENJING (董辰京)

7th Plaintiff

ZUO YING (左鶯)

8th Plaintiff

LIAO JIE (廖潔)

9th Plaintiff

ZHANG ZHENGFENG (張征峰)

10th Plaintiff

LIU YAN (劉雁)

11th Plaintiff

WANG HAN (汪涵)

12th Plaintiff

ZHOU XUAN (周宣)

13th Plaintiff

LI CHUANXIN (李傳新)

14th Plaintiff

ZHANG BIQIONG (張碧琼)

15th Plaintiff

MAO SHIHAI (毛世海) also known as MAO YIFENG (毛翊灃)

16th Plaintiff

LU PENGHU (盧澎湖)

17th Plaintiff

DAI LIYA (戴行亞)

18th Plaintiff

ZUO NING (左寧)

19th Plaintiff

GAO YALING (高雅玲)

20th Plaintiff

HUANG LIBO (黃麗波)

21st Plaintiff

SUN YU YAN (孫宇燕)

22nd Plaintiff

ZHOU CHUNZIAO (周春曉)

23rd Plaintiff

WEN WU (文武)

24th Plaintiff

TAN PENGCHENG (譚鵬程)

25th Plaintiff

ZHANG ZHENGBO (張正波)

26th Plaintiff

JU RUOXU (琚若圩) also known as QU RUOWEI (璩若圩)

27th Plaintiff

ZHOU MIN (周敏)

28th Plaintiff

YANG ZAIKUO (楊再擴)

29th Plaintiff

ZHANG YUXIU (張玉秀)

30th Plaintiff

WANG ZHIQI (王志琦)

31st Plaintiff

YANG MING (楊明)

32nd Plaintiff

LEE SHING PUT (李聖發)

33rd Plaintiff

CHAI LONG (柴隆)

34th Plaintiff

WANG HE (王賀)

35th Plaintiff

J.P. MORGAN SECURITIES (ASIA PACIFIC LIMITED)

1st Defendant

DELOITTE TOUCHE TOHMATSU (a firm)

2nd Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil: Prospectus Misrepresentation, Negligence and Statutory Claims by Shareholders / Chambers Decision on Striking Out Application (limitation)

  1. 1 When do causes of action based on prospectus misstatements and related statutory provisions accrue?
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiffs' claims are statute‑barred under Limitation Ordinance Cap.347 s4(1)
  3. 3 Whether damage was purely contingent until the company's delisting or occurred at acquisition

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the plaintiffs' causes of action (common law and statutory) accrued when they acquired the shares because real and actual diminution in the intrinsic value of the shares occurred on acquisition due to false or misleading prospectus information; consequently the six‑year limitation ran from each purchase date and the claims issued in 2019 were time‑barred.

Court Disposition

Plaintiffs' claims struck out as time‑barred and actions dismissed

Orders

  • Claims struck out and actions dismissed
  • Costs order nisi: plaintiffs to pay defendants' costs of the action including costs of the present applications and hearing with a certificate for two counsel; costs to be taxed if not agreed; order to become absolute after 14 days absent application for variation