WANG HAIHONG AND OTHERS v. J.P. MORGAN SECURITIES (ASIA PACIFIC LTD) AND ANOTHER
The court held that the plaintiffs' causes of action (common law and statutory) accrued when they acquired the shares because real and actual diminution in the intrinsic value of the shares occurred on acquisition due to false or misleading prospectus information; consequently the six‑year limitation ran from each purchase date and the claims issued in 2019 were time‑barred.
- Citation
- [2021] HKCFI 2840
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: WANG HAIHONG (王海洪); 2nd Plaintiff: LIU HONG (劉紅); 3rd Plaintiff: WANG HAIYAN (王海燕); 4th Plaintiff: LIU XIANGFEI (劉湘飛); 5th Plaintiff: GU WENPING (谷文萍); 6h Plaintiff: ZHANG HANHUA (張含華); 7th Plaintiff: DONG CHENJING (董辰京); 8th Plaintiff: ZUO YING (左鶯); 9th Plaintiff: LIAO JIE (廖潔); 10th Plaintiff: ZHANG ZHENGFENG (張征峰); 11th Plaintiff: LIU YAN (劉雁); 12th Plaintiff: WANG HAN (汪涵); 13th Plaintiff: ZHOU XUAN (周宣); 14th Plaintiff: LI CHUANXIN (李傳新); 15th Plaintiff: ZHANG BIQIONG (張碧琼); 16th Plaintiff: MAO SHIHAI (毛世海) also known as MAO YIFENG (毛翊灃); 17th Plaintiff: LU PENGHU (盧澎湖); 18th Plaintiff: DAI LIYA (戴行亞); 19th Plaintiff: ZUO NING (左寧); 20th Plaintiff: GAO YALING (高雅玲); 21st Plaintiff: HUANG LIBO (黃麗波); 22nd Plaintiff: SUN YU YAN (孫宇燕); 23rd Plaintiff: ZHOU CHUNZIAO (周春曉); 24th Plaintiff: WEN WU (文武); 25th Plaintiff: TAN PENGCHENG (譚鵬程); 26th Plaintiff: ZHANG ZHENGBO (張正波); 27th Plaintiff: JU RUOXU (琚若圩) also known as QU RUOWEI (璩若圩); 28th Plaintiff: ZHOU MIN (周敏); 29th Plaintiff: YANG ZAIKUO (楊再擴); 30th Plaintiff: ZHANG YUXIU (張玉秀); 31st Plaintiff: WANG ZHIQI (王志琦); 32nd Plaintiff: YANG MING (楊明); 33rd Plaintiff: LEE SHING PUT (李聖發); 34th Plaintiff: CHAI LONG (柴隆); 35th Plaintiff: WANG HE (王賀); 1st Defendant: J.P. MORGAN SECURITIES (ASIA PACIFIC LIMITED); 2nd Defendant: DELOITTE TOUCHE TOHMATSU (a firm)
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 28 September 2021
- Case Number
- HCA344/2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil: Prospectus Misrepresentation, Negligence and Statutory Claims by Shareholders / Chambers Decision on Striking Out Application (limitation)
- Outcome
- Plaintiffs' claims struck out as time‑barred and actions dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Prospectus Liability, Misrepresentation, Negligence, Market Misconduct, Statute of Limitations, Delisting
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
WANG HAIHONG (王海洪)
1st Plaintiff
LIU HONG (劉紅)
2nd Plaintiff
WANG HAIYAN (王海燕)
3rd Plaintiff
LIU XIANGFEI (劉湘飛)
4th Plaintiff
GU WENPING (谷文萍)
5th Plaintiff
ZHANG HANHUA (張含華)
6h Plaintiff
DONG CHENJING (董辰京)
7th Plaintiff
ZUO YING (左鶯)
8th Plaintiff
LIAO JIE (廖潔)
9th Plaintiff
ZHANG ZHENGFENG (張征峰)
10th Plaintiff
LIU YAN (劉雁)
11th Plaintiff
WANG HAN (汪涵)
12th Plaintiff
ZHOU XUAN (周宣)
13th Plaintiff
LI CHUANXIN (李傳新)
14th Plaintiff
ZHANG BIQIONG (張碧琼)
15th Plaintiff
MAO SHIHAI (毛世海) also known as MAO YIFENG (毛翊灃)
16th Plaintiff
LU PENGHU (盧澎湖)
17th Plaintiff
DAI LIYA (戴行亞)
18th Plaintiff
ZUO NING (左寧)
19th Plaintiff
GAO YALING (高雅玲)
20th Plaintiff
HUANG LIBO (黃麗波)
21st Plaintiff
SUN YU YAN (孫宇燕)
22nd Plaintiff
ZHOU CHUNZIAO (周春曉)
23rd Plaintiff
WEN WU (文武)
24th Plaintiff
TAN PENGCHENG (譚鵬程)
25th Plaintiff
ZHANG ZHENGBO (張正波)
26th Plaintiff
JU RUOXU (琚若圩) also known as QU RUOWEI (璩若圩)
27th Plaintiff
ZHOU MIN (周敏)
28th Plaintiff
YANG ZAIKUO (楊再擴)
29th Plaintiff
ZHANG YUXIU (張玉秀)
30th Plaintiff
WANG ZHIQI (王志琦)
31st Plaintiff
YANG MING (楊明)
32nd Plaintiff
LEE SHING PUT (李聖發)
33rd Plaintiff
CHAI LONG (柴隆)
34th Plaintiff
WANG HE (王賀)
35th Plaintiff
J.P. MORGAN SECURITIES (ASIA PACIFIC LIMITED)
1st Defendant
DELOITTE TOUCHE TOHMATSU (a firm)
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil: Prospectus Misrepresentation, Negligence and Statutory Claims by Shareholders / Chambers Decision on Striking Out Application (limitation)
Legal Issues
- 1 When do causes of action based on prospectus misstatements and related statutory provisions accrue?
- 2 Whether the plaintiffs' claims are statute‑barred under Limitation Ordinance Cap.347 s4(1)
- 3 Whether damage was purely contingent until the company's delisting or occurred at acquisition
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the plaintiffs' causes of action (common law and statutory) accrued when they acquired the shares because real and actual diminution in the intrinsic value of the shares occurred on acquisition due to false or misleading prospectus information; consequently the six‑year limitation ran from each purchase date and the claims issued in 2019 were time‑barred.
Court Disposition
Plaintiffs' claims struck out as time‑barred and actions dismissed
Orders
- Claims struck out and actions dismissed
- Costs order nisi: plaintiffs to pay defendants' costs of the action including costs of the present applications and hearing with a certificate for two counsel; costs to be taxed if not agreed; order to become absolute after 14 days absent application for variation
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment