LUXEBOND INVESTMENT LTD. v. SUPER ASIAN INVESTMENT LTD.
Clause 2(b) is a payment clause that makes the purchaser's obligation to pay the second deposit contingent on signing of the formal agreement; absent an express provision making time of the essence the stipulated date is a target only, so the vendor's failure to sign by that date did not amount to a repudiatory...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- LUXEBOND INVESTMENT LTD. v. SUPER ASIAN INVESTMENT LTD.
- Parties
- Plaintiff (purchaser): Luxebond Investment Limited; Defendant (vendor): Super Asian Investment Limited
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 20 April 1998
- Case Number
- HCMP794/1998
- Procedural Posture
- Vendor and Purchaser Summons / Heard and Decided; Judgment Dated 20 April 1998
- Outcome
- Purchaser's application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Provisional Agreement, Agreement Subject to Contract, Time of the Essence, Repudiatory Breach, Specific Performance, Payment Clause, Rescission
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Luxebond Investment Limited
Plaintiff (purchaser)
Super Asian Investment Limited
Defendant (vendor)
Procedural Posture
Vendor and Purchaser Summons / Heard and Decided; Judgment Dated 20 April 1998
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether clause requiring signing of formal agreement by specified date made time of the essence
- 2 Whether failure to sign the formal agreement by the stipulated date constituted a repudiatory breach enabling rescission and damages
- 3 Proper construction of Clause 2(b) (payment clause) and whether it imposed an independent obligation to sign by the target date
Ratio Decidendi
Clause 2(b) is a payment clause that makes the purchaser's obligation to pay the second deposit contingent on signing of the formal agreement; absent an express provision making time of the essence the stipulated date is a target only, so the vendor's failure to sign by that date did not amount to a repudiatory breach and the purchaser was not entitled to rescind.
Court Disposition
Purchaser's application dismissed
Orders
- Purchaser's summons dismissed
- Order nisi for costs in favour of the Vendor with liberty to apply within 14 days
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment