JOINT AND SEVERAL PROVISIONAL LIQUIDATORS OF HSIN CHONG CONSTRUCTION CO LTD (PROVISIONAL LIQUIDATORS APPOINTED) v. THE CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG AND OTHERS
The summons was dismissed because the PLs had no justification to seek directions under section 200(3): the application sought to outsource a commercial decision the PLs had already taken; there was no genuine dispute or creditor challenge requiring court determination; the PLs lacked prior court sanction to commence the proceedings while provisional liquidators; and the factual/legal issues identified did not support the necessity of the application. Costs were ordered against the PLs and the court invited submissions on depriving the PLs' rights to remuneration and cost recovery.
- Citation
- [2020] HKCFI 2434
- Parties
- Applicants: Joint and several provisional liquidators of Hsin Chong Construction Company Limited (provisional liquidators appointed); 1st Respondent: The Chinese University of Hong Kong; 2nd Respondent: Westwood Limited; 3rd Respondent: RAFT (E&M) Engineering Limited; 4th Respondent: Huns Engineering Company LMITED; 5th Respondent: Pyrofoe Engineers Limited; 6th Respondent: Skyforce Engineering Limited; 7th Respondent: KONE Elevator (HK) Limited
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 18 September 2020
- Case Number
- HCCW239/2018
- Procedural Posture
- Companies (winding Up) Proceedings / Application for Directions Under Section 200(3) During Provisional Liquidation
- Outcome
- Summons dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Provisional Liquidation, Directions Under Section 200(3), Retention Monies, Direct Payment Clauses to Subcontractors, Pari Passu Principle, Set Off, Requirement for Court Sanction
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Joint and several provisional liquidators of Hsin Chong Construction Company Limited (provisional liquidators appointed)
Applicants
The Chinese University of Hong Kong
1st Respondent
Westwood Limited
2nd Respondent
RAFT (E&M) Engineering Limited
3rd Respondent
Huns Engineering Company LMITED
4th Respondent
Pyrofoe Engineers Limited
5th Respondent
Skyforce Engineering Limited
6th Respondent
KONE Elevator (HK) Limited
7th Respondent
Procedural Posture
Companies (winding Up) Proceedings / Application for Directions Under Section 200(3) During Provisional Liquidation
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether provisional liquidators properly sought directions under s200(3) in respect of distributions to nominated subcontractors
- 2 Whether retention monies were held on express trust by the employer for the subcontractors
- 3 Whether existence of set-off mechanism negates existence of a trust over retention monies
Ratio Decidendi
The summons was dismissed because the PLs had no justification to seek directions under section 200(3): the application sought to outsource a commercial decision the PLs had already taken; there was no genuine dispute or creditor challenge requiring court determination; the PLs lacked prior court sanction to commence the proceedings while provisional liquidators; and the factual/legal issues identified did not support the necessity of the application. Costs were ordered against the PLs and the court invited submissions on depriving the PLs' rights to remuneration and cost recovery.
Court Disposition
Summons dismissed
Orders
- Summons dated 2 July 2020 dismissed
- Costs of and occasioned by the Summons to be paid by the provisional liquidators to Huns Engineering Company Limited, to be assessed by way of gross sum assessment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment