RE MF GLOBAL HONG KONG LTD
A provisional liquidator in office by virtue of section 194(1)(aa) of the Companies Ordinance is not a "liquidator" for the purposes of section 202(1); therefore section 202(1) and the ad valorem fee provisions of the Companies (Fees and Percentages) Order do not apply to sums realised by such provisional liquidators absent legislative change.
- Citation
- RE MF GLOBAL HONG KONG LTD
- Parties
- Company: MF Global Hong Kong Limited; Company: MF Global Holdings HK Limited; Joint and Several Provisional Liquidators / Applicants: Patrick Cowley; Fergal Power; Lui Yee Man (KPMG); Respondent / Interested Party: Official Receiver
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 4 October 2012
- Case Number
- HCCW356/2011
- Procedural Posture
- Companies (winding Up) / Application to Convert Court Winding Up to Creditors' Voluntary Winding Up and Determination Whether S202(1) Companies Ordinance Applies (decision on Conversion and Statutory Interpretation)
- Outcome
- Application granted in part: both liquidations converted to creditors' voluntary winding up; provisional liquidators appointed as joint and several liquidators; committees of inspection appointed; statutory construction ruling that s202(1) does not apply to provisional liquidators in office under s194(1)(aa).
- Legal Topics
- Provisional Liquidator, Creditors' Voluntary Winding Up, Companies Liquidation Account, Ad Valorem Fees, Committees of Inspection, Definition of Liquidator
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
MF Global Hong Kong Limited
Company
MF Global Holdings HK Limited
Company
Patrick Cowley; Fergal Power; Lui Yee Man (KPMG)
Joint and Several Provisional Liquidators / Applicants
Official Receiver
Respondent / Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Companies (winding Up) / Application to Convert Court Winding Up to Creditors' Voluntary Winding Up and Determination Whether S202(1) Companies Ordinance Applies (decision on Conversion and Statutory Interpretation)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a provisional liquidator in office under section 194(1)(aa) of the Companies Ordinance is a "liquidator" for the purposes of section 202(1)
- 2 Whether moneys realised by such provisional liquidators must be paid into the Companies Liquidation Account and attract ad valorem fees under the Companies (Fees and Percentages) Order Cap 32C
- 3 Whether the court should convert the court winding ups into creditors' voluntary winding ups and appoint the provisional liquidators as joint and several liquidators and establish committees of inspection, and the appropriate committee composition
Ratio Decidendi
A provisional liquidator in office by virtue of section 194(1)(aa) of the Companies Ordinance is not a "liquidator" for the purposes of section 202(1); therefore section 202(1) and the ad valorem fee provisions of the Companies (Fees and Percentages) Order do not apply to sums realised by such provisional liquidators absent legislative change.
Court Disposition
Application granted in part: both liquidations converted to creditors' voluntary winding up; provisional liquidators appointed as joint and several liquidators; committees of inspection appointed; statutory construction ruling that s202(1) does not apply to provisional liquidators in office under s194(1)(aa).
Orders
- Both MF Global Hong Kong Limited and MF Global Holdings HK Limited converted to creditors' voluntary winding up pursuant to section 209A of the Companies Ordinance
- Patrick Cowley, Fergal Power and Lui Yee Man (KPMG) appointed as joint and several liquidators of each company under section 194(1)(c)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment