RE MF GLOBAL HONG KONG LTD

RE MF GLOBAL HONG KONG LTD

A provisional liquidator in office by virtue of section 194(1)(aa) of the Companies Ordinance is not a "liquidator" for the purposes of section 202(1); therefore section 202(1) and the ad valorem fee provisions of the Companies (Fees and Percentages) Order do not apply to sums realised by such provisional liquidators absent legislative change.

Citation
RE MF GLOBAL HONG KONG LTD
Parties
Company: MF Global Hong Kong Limited; Company: MF Global Holdings HK Limited; Joint and Several Provisional Liquidators / Applicants: Patrick Cowley; Fergal Power; Lui Yee Man (KPMG); Respondent / Interested Party: Official Receiver
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
4 October 2012
Case Number
HCCW356/2011
Procedural Posture
Companies (winding Up) / Application to Convert Court Winding Up to Creditors' Voluntary Winding Up and Determination Whether S202(1) Companies Ordinance Applies (decision on Conversion and Statutory Interpretation)
Outcome
Application granted in part: both liquidations converted to creditors' voluntary winding up; provisional liquidators appointed as joint and several liquidators; committees of inspection appointed; statutory construction ruling that s202(1) does not apply to provisional liquidators in office under s194(1)(aa).
Legal Topics
Provisional Liquidator, Creditors' Voluntary Winding Up, Companies Liquidation Account, Ad Valorem Fees, Committees of Inspection, Definition of Liquidator
Source Language
EN

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

MF Global Hong Kong Limited

Company

MF Global Holdings HK Limited

Company

Patrick Cowley; Fergal Power; Lui Yee Man (KPMG)

Joint and Several Provisional Liquidators / Applicants

Official Receiver

Respondent / Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Companies (winding Up) / Application to Convert Court Winding Up to Creditors' Voluntary Winding Up and Determination Whether S202(1) Companies Ordinance Applies (decision on Conversion and Statutory Interpretation)

  1. 1 Whether a provisional liquidator in office under section 194(1)(aa) of the Companies Ordinance is a "liquidator" for the purposes of section 202(1)
  2. 2 Whether moneys realised by such provisional liquidators must be paid into the Companies Liquidation Account and attract ad valorem fees under the Companies (Fees and Percentages) Order Cap 32C
  3. 3 Whether the court should convert the court winding ups into creditors' voluntary winding ups and appoint the provisional liquidators as joint and several liquidators and establish committees of inspection, and the appropriate committee composition

Ratio Decidendi

A provisional liquidator in office by virtue of section 194(1)(aa) of the Companies Ordinance is not a "liquidator" for the purposes of section 202(1); therefore section 202(1) and the ad valorem fee provisions of the Companies (Fees and Percentages) Order do not apply to sums realised by such provisional liquidators absent legislative change.

Court Disposition

Application granted in part: both liquidations converted to creditors' voluntary winding up; provisional liquidators appointed as joint and several liquidators; committees of inspection appointed; statutory construction ruling that s202(1) does not apply to provisional liquidators in office under s194(1)(aa).

Orders

  • Both MF Global Hong Kong Limited and MF Global Holdings HK Limited converted to creditors' voluntary winding up pursuant to section 209A of the Companies Ordinance
  • Patrick Cowley, Fergal Power and Lui Yee Man (KPMG) appointed as joint and several liquidators of each company under section 194(1)(c)