RE MILLIE\'S TRADING CO. LTD.
The Court held that allegations of misfeasance cannot be litigated in the present summonses for directions as to remuneration; the Official Receiver must either commence separate proceedings under s.276 or withdraw the allegations, otherwise he is barred from raising them at the adjourned hearing; the proper course...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- RE MILLIE\'S TRADING CO. LTD.
- Parties
- Applicants; Provisional Liquidators: W.K. Timso and T.B. Stevenson (Messrs. Ernst & Whinney); Official Receiver; Respondent: Official Receiver; Company in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation: Millie's Shoes Factory Limited; Company in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation: Millie's Property Management Co. Ltd.; Company in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation: Sum Chun High Quality Shoes Factory Ltd.; Company in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation: Millie's Handbag and Shoes Factory Ltd.; Company in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation: Millie's Wholesale Centre Ltd.; Company in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation: Millie's Trading Co. Ltd.
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 21 November 1985
- Case Number
- HCMP95/1985
- Procedural Posture
- Companies Ordinance Applications Concerning Provisional Liquidator Remuneration (s.228 A; S.255) / Ruling (applications Adjourned for Further Directions)
- Outcome
- Applications adjourned; Official Receiver ordered to attend and lodge report; Official Receiver barred from raising misfeasance allegations at the adjourned hearing unless he commences separate proceedings under s.276 or withdraws the allegations; fees to be assessed by a Master under Rule 6; costs ordered against...
- Legal Topics
- Provisional Liquidator Remuneration, Taxation of Costs, Misfeasance Allegations, Companies Ordinance S.228 a, Companies Ordinance S.255, Companies Ordinance S.276, Companies (winding Up) Rules Rule 6
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
W.K. Timso and T.B. Stevenson (Messrs. Ernst & Whinney)
Applicants; Provisional Liquidators
Official Receiver
Official Receiver; Respondent
Millie's Shoes Factory Limited
Company in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation
Millie's Property Management Co. Ltd.
Company in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation
Sum Chun High Quality Shoes Factory Ltd.
Company in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation
Millie's Handbag and Shoes Factory Ltd.
Company in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation
Millie's Wholesale Centre Ltd.
Company in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation
Millie's Trading Co. Ltd.
Company in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation
Procedural Posture
Companies Ordinance Applications Concerning Provisional Liquidator Remuneration (s.228 A; S.255) / Ruling (applications Adjourned for Further Directions)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether provisional liquidators appointed under s.228A are entitled to remuneration calculated by reference to time spent at reasonable rates or must be assessed on a percentage basis
- 2 Whether a taxing Master should confine taxable work to preservation or urgent realisation of assets
- 3 Whether the Official Receiver may raise allegations of misfeasance in the same proceedings for directions as to remuneration or must institute separate proceedings under s.276
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that allegations of misfeasance cannot be litigated in the present summonses for directions as to remuneration; the Official Receiver must either commence separate proceedings under s.276 or withdraw the allegations, otherwise he is barred from raising them at the adjourned hearing; the proper course for assessment of the applicants' fees is by taxation before a Master pursuant to Rule 6 and a report to the Companies Judge.
Court Disposition
Applications adjourned; Official Receiver ordered to attend and lodge report; Official Receiver barred from raising misfeasance allegations at the adjourned hearing unless he commences separate proceedings under s.276 or withdraws the allegations; fees to be assessed by a Master under Rule 6; costs ordered against...
Orders
- Fees of the applicants to be considered by a Master pursuant to Rule 6 of the Companies (Winding-up) Rules and for a report to be submitted to the Companies Judge
- Official Receiver to attend and to lodge a report (filed in accordance with directions)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment