RE MILLIE\'S TRADING CO. LTD.

RE MILLIE\'S TRADING CO. LTD.

The Court held that allegations of misfeasance cannot be litigated in the present summonses for directions as to remuneration; the Official Receiver must either commence separate proceedings under s.276 or withdraw the allegations, otherwise he is barred from raising them at the adjourned hearing; the proper course...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RE MILLIE\'S TRADING CO. LTD.
Parties
Applicants; Provisional Liquidators: W.K. Timso and T.B. Stevenson (Messrs. Ernst & Whinney); Official Receiver; Respondent: Official Receiver; Company in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation: Millie's Shoes Factory Limited; Company in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation: Millie's Property Management Co. Ltd.; Company in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation: Sum Chun High Quality Shoes Factory Ltd.; Company in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation: Millie's Handbag and Shoes Factory Ltd.; Company in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation: Millie's Wholesale Centre Ltd.; Company in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation: Millie's Trading Co. Ltd.
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
21 November 1985
Case Number
HCMP95/1985
Procedural Posture
Companies Ordinance Applications Concerning Provisional Liquidator Remuneration (s.228 A; S.255) / Ruling (applications Adjourned for Further Directions)
Outcome
Applications adjourned; Official Receiver ordered to attend and lodge report; Official Receiver barred from raising misfeasance allegations at the adjourned hearing unless he commences separate proceedings under s.276 or withdraws the allegations; fees to be assessed by a Master under Rule 6; costs ordered against...
Legal Topics
Provisional Liquidator Remuneration, Taxation of Costs, Misfeasance Allegations, Companies Ordinance S.228 a, Companies Ordinance S.255, Companies Ordinance S.276, Companies (winding Up) Rules Rule 6
Source Language
en
Company Law Insolvency Procedural Law Professional Conduct Provisional Liquidator Remuneration Taxation of Costs Misfeasance Allegations Companies Ordinance S.228 a +3 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

W.K. Timso and T.B. Stevenson (Messrs. Ernst & Whinney)

Applicants; Provisional Liquidators

Official Receiver

Official Receiver; Respondent

Millie's Shoes Factory Limited

Company in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation

Millie's Property Management Co. Ltd.

Company in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation

Sum Chun High Quality Shoes Factory Ltd.

Company in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation

Millie's Handbag and Shoes Factory Ltd.

Company in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation

Millie's Wholesale Centre Ltd.

Company in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation

Millie's Trading Co. Ltd.

Company in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation

Procedural Posture

Companies Ordinance Applications Concerning Provisional Liquidator Remuneration (s.228 A; S.255) / Ruling (applications Adjourned for Further Directions)

  1. 1 Whether provisional liquidators appointed under s.228A are entitled to remuneration calculated by reference to time spent at reasonable rates or must be assessed on a percentage basis
  2. 2 Whether a taxing Master should confine taxable work to preservation or urgent realisation of assets
  3. 3 Whether the Official Receiver may raise allegations of misfeasance in the same proceedings for directions as to remuneration or must institute separate proceedings under s.276

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that allegations of misfeasance cannot be litigated in the present summonses for directions as to remuneration; the Official Receiver must either commence separate proceedings under s.276 or withdraw the allegations, otherwise he is barred from raising them at the adjourned hearing; the proper course for assessment of the applicants' fees is by taxation before a Master pursuant to Rule 6 and a report to the Companies Judge.

Court Disposition

Applications adjourned; Official Receiver ordered to attend and lodge report; Official Receiver barred from raising misfeasance allegations at the adjourned hearing unless he commences separate proceedings under s.276 or withdraws the allegations; fees to be assessed by a Master under Rule 6; costs ordered against...

Orders

  • Fees of the applicants to be considered by a Master pursuant to Rule 6 of the Companies (Winding-up) Rules and for a report to be submitted to the Companies Judge
  • Official Receiver to attend and to lodge a report (filed in accordance with directions)