RE JINRO (HK) INTERNATIONAL LTD
The court exercised its discretion to appoint provisional liquidators because the petitioners established the requisite prima facie case for winding up, there were real prospects that provisional liquidators could preserve and realise value in Jinro Japan and cooperate with the Korean receiver and KPMG, and independent interim management was necessary to protect the distinct interests of the Company's creditors which might diverge from those of Jinro Korea.
- Citation
- RE JINRO (HK) INTERNATIONAL LTD
- Parties
- Petitioning Creditor: Goldman Sachs International; Petitioning Creditor: Goldman Sachs (Asia) Finance; Respondent / Company: Jinro (H.K.) International Limited; Supporting Creditor: Avenue Asia International Limited; Supporting Creditor: Avenue Asia Investments, L.P.; Interested Party / Official Receiver: Official Receiver
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 9 July 2003
- Case Number
- HCCW1352/2001
- Procedural Posture
- Companies (winding‑up) / Application for Appointment of Provisional Liquidators After Substantive Hearing of Winding‑up Petition; Petition Adjourned Pending Report
- Outcome
- Application granted; provisional liquidators appointed subject to conditions
- Legal Topics
- Provisional Liquidators, Winding‑up Petition, Receivership, Interim Preservation of Assets, International Cooperation
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Goldman Sachs International
Petitioning Creditor
Goldman Sachs (Asia) Finance
Petitioning Creditor
Jinro (H.K.) International Limited
Respondent / Company
Avenue Asia International Limited
Supporting Creditor
Avenue Asia Investments, L.P.
Supporting Creditor
Official Receiver
Interested Party / Official Receiver
Procedural Posture
Companies (winding‑up) / Application for Appointment of Provisional Liquidators After Substantive Hearing of Winding‑up Petition; Petition Adjourned Pending Report
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether provisional liquidators should be appointed under section 193 of the Companies Ordinance
- 2 Whether petitioners have shown a good prima facie case for winding up
- 3 Whether appointment is appropriate given parallel Korean reorganisation and receiver
Ratio Decidendi
The court exercised its discretion to appoint provisional liquidators because the petitioners established the requisite prima facie case for winding up, there were real prospects that provisional liquidators could preserve and realise value in Jinro Japan and cooperate with the Korean receiver and KPMG, and independent interim management was necessary to protect the distinct interests of the Company's creditors which might diverge from those of Jinro Korea.
Court Disposition
Application granted; provisional liquidators appointed subject to conditions
Orders
- Leave granted to petitioners to amend the summons for appointment of provisional liquidators and order made in terms of paragraphs 1 to 3 of the amended summons filed 20 June 2003
- Appointment of Mr Kelvin Edward Flynn, Mr Roderick John Sutton and Mr Desmond Chung Seng Chiong of Ferrier Hodgson Limited jointly and severally as provisional liquidators of Jinro (H.K.) International Limited until further order, conditional upon the petitioners undertaking as to damages
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment