RE CHINA SOLAR ENERGY HOLDINGS LTD
Applying Brookes the court found no change of circumstances sufficient to displace the general rule: the opposing contributories' withdrawal was pragmatic and motivated by a friendly white knight they helped procure, not by supervening events or unreasonable conduct by respondents. The ex parte appointment was not shown to be bound to fail. Therefore the discontinuing contributories must pay the costs of the company and Ankang; costs to be taxed if not agreed, with certificate for counsel.
- Citation
- RE CHINA SOLAR ENERGY HOLDINGS LTD
- Parties
- 1st Opposing Contributory: Larm Cheung Hon Peter; 1st Opposing Contributory: Lo Chun Kit Ken; 2nd Opposing Contributory: Chong Cheng Keat Patrick; 2nd Opposing Contributory: Shi Yu Han; 2nd Opposing Contributory: Yang Xin Yu; 2nd Opposing Contributory: Yang Mao Zhong; Company: China Solar Energy Holdings Limited; Petitioner: Ankang Limited; Provisional Liquidators: Provisional Liquidators
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 1 March 2016
- Case Number
- HCCW108/2015
- Procedural Posture
- Companies (winding Up) Proceedings / Substantive Hearing on Costs Following Discontinuance of Summonses
- Outcome
- Leave granted to withdraw summonses; costs awarded against opposing contributories
- Legal Topics
- Provisional Liquidators, Discontinuance of Proceedings, Costs Orders, Change of Circumstances, Corporate Restructuring, Delisting
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Larm Cheung Hon Peter
1st Opposing Contributory
Lo Chun Kit Ken
1st Opposing Contributory
Chong Cheng Keat Patrick
2nd Opposing Contributory
Shi Yu Han
2nd Opposing Contributory
Yang Xin Yu
2nd Opposing Contributory
Yang Mao Zhong
2nd Opposing Contributory
China Solar Energy Holdings Limited
Company
Ankang Limited
Petitioner
Provisional Liquidators
Provisional Liquidators
Procedural Posture
Companies (winding Up) Proceedings / Substantive Hearing on Costs Following Discontinuance of Summonses
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the discontinuing contributories should be ordered to pay the costs of the company and Ankang
- 2 Whether there was a change of circumstances sufficient to displace the general rule that a discontinuing party pays costs
- 3 Whether the ex parte appointment of provisional liquidators was unjustified and bound to be discharged
Ratio Decidendi
Applying Brookes the court found no change of circumstances sufficient to displace the general rule: the opposing contributories' withdrawal was pragmatic and motivated by a friendly white knight they helped procure, not by supervening events or unreasonable conduct by respondents. The ex parte appointment was not shown to be bound to fail. Therefore the discontinuing contributories must pay the costs of the company and Ankang; costs to be taxed if not agreed, with certificate for counsel.
Court Disposition
Leave granted to withdraw summonses; costs awarded against opposing contributories
Orders
- Opposing contributories granted leave to withdraw their respective summonses
- Costs of and arising out of the 1st summons to be paid by the 1st opposing contributories to the company and Ankang, to be taxed if not agreed, with certificate for counsel
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment