DANIEL ISAAC HENRI MIMOUN AND OTHERS v. DRAGON CONCEPT HK LTD AND OTHERS
The court ordered that the provisional liquidators' costs and disbursements for the period 2 January 2013 to 1 March 2013 be paid by the petitioners rather than out of the company's assets because the appointment was unnecessary from 2 January 2013; the petitioners must also pay the 2nd respondent's costs of today's application on an indemnity basis due to their failure to attend or agree an order.
- Citation
- [2018] HKCFI 492
- Parties
- 1st Petitioner: Daniel Isaac Henri Mimoun; 2nd Petitioner: Raphael Vittorio Mimoun; 3rd Petitioner: Excel Future Development Limited; 1st Respondent: Dragon Concept HK Limited; 2nd Respondent: Cameron Investments Limited; 3rd Respondent: Franck David Isaac Berrebi; Beneficiary: Axelle Liza Dya Mimoun; Beneficiary: Tiffany Fortune Marine Mimoun; Beneficiary: Simon Sacha Mimoun
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 1 March 2018
- Case Number
- HCCW434/2012
- Procedural Posture
- Companies Winding Up Proceedings / Hearing on Inquiry Into Provisional Liquidators' Costs for Period 2 January 2013 to 1 March 2013 and Costs of Today's Application
- Outcome
- Order made that petitioners pay the provisional liquidators' costs and disbursements for 2 January 2013 to 1 March 2013 and that the petitioners pay the 2nd respondent's costs of the application on an indemnity basis.
- Legal Topics
- Provisional Liquidators, Costs, Damages, Appointment of Provisional Liquidators, Indemnity Costs
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Daniel Isaac Henri Mimoun
1st Petitioner
Raphael Vittorio Mimoun
2nd Petitioner
Excel Future Development Limited
3rd Petitioner
Dragon Concept HK Limited
1st Respondent
Cameron Investments Limited
2nd Respondent
Franck David Isaac Berrebi
3rd Respondent
Axelle Liza Dya Mimoun
Beneficiary
Tiffany Fortune Marine Mimoun
Beneficiary
Simon Sacha Mimoun
Beneficiary
Procedural Posture
Companies Winding Up Proceedings / Hearing on Inquiry Into Provisional Liquidators' Costs for Period 2 January 2013 to 1 March 2013 and Costs of Today's Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether provisional liquidators' costs and disbursements for 2 Jan 2013 to 1 Mar 2013 should be paid by the petitioners rather than out of company assets
- 2 Whether the 2nd respondent is entitled to an order for costs of the application and whether those costs should be on an indemnity basis
Ratio Decidendi
The court ordered that the provisional liquidators' costs and disbursements for the period 2 January 2013 to 1 March 2013 be paid by the petitioners rather than out of the company's assets because the appointment was unnecessary from 2 January 2013; the petitioners must also pay the 2nd respondent's costs of today's application on an indemnity basis due to their failure to attend or agree an order.
Court Disposition
Order made that petitioners pay the provisional liquidators' costs and disbursements for 2 January 2013 to 1 March 2013 and that the petitioners pay the 2nd respondent's costs of the application on an indemnity basis.
Orders
- Provisional liquidators' costs and disbursements for the period 2 January 2013 to 1 March 2013 to be paid by the petitioners and not out of the assets of the Company
- The petitioners to pay the 2nd respondent's costs of today's application assessed on an indemnity basis
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment