RE LEHMAN BROTHERS FUTURES ASIA LTD
The court exercised its jurisdiction to permit interim payments on account but limited the payment to 75% of the fees claimed for the provisional liquidation period (excluding fees relating to billing tasks) and 100% of other disbursements, granted liberty to apply for further interim payments, required undertakings...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- RE LEHMAN BROTHERS FUTURES ASIA LTD
- Parties
- Subject of Winding Up Petitions: Lehman Brothers group companies (LBSA, LBFA, LBCCA, Lehman Brothers Asia Limited, LBAH, LBACC, LBQ, LBN); Applicants (provisional Liquidators Then Liquidators): Paul Brough, Edward Middleton and Patrick Cowley (KPMG); Interested Party/opponent on Safeguards: Official Receiver; Solicitors to the Provisional Liquidators (principal Firm): O'Melveny & Myers; Solicitors Instructed by the Provisional Liquidators: Linklaters; Solicitors Instructed by the Provisional Liquidators: Mayer Brown JSM
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 25 August 2009
- Case Number
- HCCW452/2008
- Procedural Posture
- Companies (winding Up) / Directions Hearing on Interim Payments and Assessment of Liquidators' Remuneration (judgment on Interim Payment)
- Outcome
- Interim payments ordered in part; validation order granted; further directions reserved for final assessment
- Legal Topics
- Provisional Liquidators' Remuneration, Interim Payment on Account, Validation Order Under S182, Assessment Procedure for Fees, Billing Task Recoverability, Undertakings and Security
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lehman Brothers group companies (LBSA, LBFA, LBCCA, Lehman Brothers Asia Limited, LBAH, LBACC, LBQ, LBN)
Subject of Winding Up Petitions
Paul Brough, Edward Middleton and Patrick Cowley (KPMG)
Applicants (provisional Liquidators Then Liquidators)
Official Receiver
Interested Party/opponent on Safeguards
O'Melveny & Myers
Solicitors to the Provisional Liquidators (principal Firm)
Linklaters
Solicitors Instructed by the Provisional Liquidators
Mayer Brown JSM
Solicitors Instructed by the Provisional Liquidators
Procedural Posture
Companies (winding Up) / Directions Hearing on Interim Payments and Assessment of Liquidators' Remuneration (judgment on Interim Payment)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether court has jurisdiction to order interim payment to provisional/liquidators
- 2 Appropriate quantum/percentage for interim payment on account of fees and agents' fees
- 3 Whether fees for billing-related tasks are recoverable and payable on interim basis
Ratio Decidendi
The court exercised its jurisdiction to permit interim payments on account but limited the payment to 75% of the fees claimed for the provisional liquidation period (excluding fees relating to billing tasks) and 100% of other disbursements, granted liberty to apply for further interim payments, required undertakings from the Provisional Liquidators and principal Hong Kong solicitors to repay any excess, and validated the payments under section 182; billing-task fees were excluded from interim payment pending further assessment.
Court Disposition
Interim payments ordered in part; validation order granted; further directions reserved for final assessment
Orders
- Interim payment of 75% of fees claimed by the Provisional Liquidators and their agents for the Provisional Liquidation Period, excluding fees incurred in relation to the Billing Tasks
- Interim payment of 100% of other disbursements (excluding agents' fees) for the Provisional Liquidation Period
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment