Hong Kong Judgment

Court of First Instance

QUESCO HOLDINGS LTD v. QUESCO SYSTEMS LTD AND ANOTHER

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

Because the 2nd defendant held the one share as nominee for the applicant pursuant to a declaration of trust, had executed an instrument of transfer and appointed the applicant as attorney, and substituted service had been effected, the court was empowered to order the transfer and entry on the register despite the absence of the original transfer instrument.

Court disposition

Application granted

Orders

  • Order that one share of the 1st defendant standing in the name of the 2nd defendant as nominee for the applicant be transferred to the applicant
  • Order that the transfer be entered on the register of members of the 1st defendant
  • No order as to costs

02

Material facts

Parties

Quesco Holdings Limited (formerly Lecco Strategic Holdings Limited)

Applicant Counsel: Ms Lau Yan Ling of Messrs Fong Yin Cheung & Co.

Quesco Systems Limited (formerly Lecco Consultants Limited)

1st Defendant

Yu Cheuk Sin

2nd Defendant

Amounts and remedies

  • Shares Transferred: 1

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Companies Matter Under Section 100 Companies Ordinance (cap.32) / Decision on Originating Summons After Hearing Restored Following Substituted Service

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The applicant relied on a declaration of trust and an executed instrument of transfer and an irrevocable appointment of the applicant as attorney by the 2nd defendant showing the share was held as nominee for the applicant; substituted service had been obtained; the court should order transfer and entry on the register despite the original transfer documents being lost.
Respondent
No affidavits or appearances were filed by either defendant; no opposing argument was presented; the defendants were absent.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Section 100 Companies Ordinance (Cap.32) and equitable principles governing trusts and nominees

    Court may order transfer of share and direct entry on the register where share is held on trust for the applicant and the nominee has undertaken to transfer or appointed the applicant as attorney

  2. 02

    Practice of the High Court concerning substituted service and procedure

    Where substituted service is properly effected and defendants are absent, the court may hear and determine the originating summons on the evidence available

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

Because the 2nd defendant held the one share as nominee for the applicant pursuant to a declaration of trust, had executed an instrument of transfer and appointed the applicant as attorney, and substituted service had been effected, the court was empowered to order the transfer and entry on the register despite the absence of the original transfer instrument.

Court disposition

Application granted

  • Order that one share of the 1st defendant standing in the name of the 2nd defendant as nominee for the applicant be transferred to the applicant
  • Order that the transfer be entered on the register of members of the 1st defendant
  • No order as to costs

Source and reliance status

Court of First Instance · 10 October 2007

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court of First Instance

Judgment· 10 October 2007

QUESCO HOLDINGS LTD v. QUESCO SYSTEMS LTD AND ANOTHER

bjbj HCMP 81/2007

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 81 OF 2007 ____ IN THE MATTER of QUESCO SYSTEMS LIMITED formerly known as LECCO CONSULTANTS LIMITED and IN THE MATTER of Section 100 of the Companies Ordinance, Cap. 32 of the Laws of Hong Kong ____

BETWEEN QUESCO HOLDINGS LIMITED Applicant formerly known as LECCO STRATEGIC HOLDINGS LIMITED and QUESCO SYSTEMS LIMITED 1st Defendant formerly known as LECCO CONSULTANTS LIMITED YU CHEUK SIN 2nd Defendant Before: Hon Kwan J in Chambers Date of Hearing: 10 October 2007 Date of Decision: 10 October 2007 ______

D E C I S I O N ______ This is an application by originating summons taken out by Quesco Holdings Limited, seeking an order that one share of Quesco Systems Limited, the 1st defendant herein, standing in the name of Yu Cheuk Sin, the 2nd defendant herein, as the nominee for the applicant, be transferred to the applicant and that the transfer be entered on the register of members of the 1st defendant. The application first came before the court on 26 January 2007. It was adjourned for the applicant to seek an order for substituted service of the originating summons and supporting affirmation on the 2nd defendant. That order was obtained from the Registrar on 21 June 2007 and was complied with on 7 August 2007. Hence, the application was restored for hearing today. The 2nd defendant was an employee of the applicant at the material time and he held one share in the 1st defendant as the nominee and for the benefit of the applicant. He executed a declaration of trust on 17 March 2000 which was exhibited in the supporting affirmation of the applicant. By the declaration of trust, the 2nd defendant undertook when called upon to do so by the applicant to transfer the share he held as the applicant may direct and for such purpose he had executed an instrument of transfer of the share he held. He had also irrevocably appointed the applicant as his attorney, to insert the name of

such person as the applicant shall nominate to take a transfer of the share. The applicant and the 1st defendant are, however, unable to locate the instrument of transfer or the bought and sold notes signed by the 2nd defendant in the applicant s favour. The 2nd defendant left the employment of the applicant in March 2006 and despite repeated attempts, the applicant has not been able to locate the 2nd defendant. It is appropriate in the circumstances to grant this application. I make an order that the one share of the 1st defendant now standing in the name of the 2nd defendant as nominee for the applicant be transferred to the applicant. I further order that the transfer be entered on the register of members of the 1st defendant. I make no order as to the costs of this application. (S Kwan) Judge of the Court of First Instance High Court Ms Lau Yan Ling of Messrs Fong Yin Cheung & Co., for the Applicant The 1st Defendant, absent The 2nd Defendant, absent 1udk 1udk i$&` r*pa 5<>| P!_HD Vx[Hi w[{t0 w[{t P!_H HCCW.dot setup Microsoft Word 9.0 Judiciary Hong Kong Title Microsoft Word Document MSWordDoc Word.Document.8

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) s100

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.