RAI UMESH v. CARSON ENGINEERING LTD
The court preferred and accepted Dr Lee's medical opinion supported by radiographs that the scaphoid fracture had healed and residual impairment was minimal; medical opinions on earning capacity were disregarded; the court adopted the Board's 3% loss of earning capacity as reasonable in the applicant's circumstances and awarded Section 9 compensation of $28,252.80, dismissed the appeal against the Board, and awarded agreed amounts under Sections 10 and 10A together with interest and costs as ordered.
- Citation
- RAI UMESH v. CARSON ENGINEERING LTD
- Parties
- Applicant: Rai Umesh; Respondent: Carson Engineering Limited
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 28 May 2007
- Case Number
- DCEC28/2006
- Procedural Posture
- Employees Compensation / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; judgment entered for Applicant for statutory compensation under Sections 9, 10 and 10A as calculated by the court.
- Legal Topics
- Permanent Partial Incapacity, Temporary Incapacity, Medical Expenses, Quantum of Damages, Assessment of Loss of Earning Capacity, Appeal Against Board Assessment
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rai Umesh
Applicant
Carson Engineering Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employees Compensation / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Board's 3% assessment of loss of earning capacity should be set aside
- 2 Proper quantum for Sections 9(1)(b), 10 and 10A of the Employees Compensation Ordinance
- 3 Admissibility and weight of medical opinions on loss of earning capacity
Ratio Decidendi
The court preferred and accepted Dr Lee's medical opinion supported by radiographs that the scaphoid fracture had healed and residual impairment was minimal; medical opinions on earning capacity were disregarded; the court adopted the Board's 3% loss of earning capacity as reasonable in the applicant's circumstances and awarded Section 9 compensation of $28,252.80, dismissed the appeal against the Board, and awarded agreed amounts under Sections 10 and 10A together with interest and costs as ordered.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; judgment entered for Applicant for statutory compensation under Sections 9, 10 and 10A as calculated by the court.
Orders
- Award under Section 9 (permanent partial incapacity) $28,252.80
- Award under Section 10 (temporary incapacity) $29.00
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment