RE CHINA STEEL DEVELOPMENT CO LTD
- Citation
- RE CHINA STEEL DEVELOPMENT CO LTD
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Decision
- 27 July 2009
- Posture
- Companies (winding Up) / Winding Up Order Made
- Case number
- HCCW142/2009
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Decision
- 27 July 2009
- Posture
- Companies (winding Up) / Winding Up Order Made
- Case number
- HCCW142/2009
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The court concluded the petitioners proved each company was unable to pay its debts as they fell due and that presentation of petitions and related defaults accelerated indebtedness; accordingly winding-up orders were made for each company and costs were to be paid out of the assets of the company concerned.
Court disposition
Winding-up orders made in respect of each of the companies named in the petitions.
Orders
- Make winding-up order in respect of each of the companies in the four petitions.
- The costs of the petitioner are to be paid out of the assets of the company concerned.
02
Material facts
Parties
AAHL
Company (subject)AAICL
Company (subject)CSDCL
Company (subject)AAMCL
Company (subject)AA Investments Company Limited
Company (subject)Public Bank (Hong Kong) Limited
Petitioner Counsel: Mr William WongPetitioner in HCCW Nos. 140, 141 & 142
Petitioner Counsel: Miss Elizabeth CheungProvisional Liquidators
Provisional Liquidators Counsel: Mr Douglas LamOfficial Receiver
Official Receiver Counsel: Miss Vivian YeungSupporting Creditors: OK Spring Roll Limited Partnership & Asia Aluminum Group Limited
Supporting Creditors Counsel: Messrs Clifford ChanceJoint Receivers
Joint Receivers Counsel: Messrs Allen & OveryAmounts and remedies
- AAHL 8% Senior Notes Principal Outstanding (16 Feb 2009): USD 450,000,000
- AAICL 12% Senior PIK Notes Aggregate: USD 335,000,000
- AAICL 14% Senior PIK Notes Aggregate: USD 180,000,000
- Demands Under Corporate Guarantees to AAHL (feb Mar 2009): USD 9,900,000
- Group Consolidated Current Liabilities (dec 2008): HKD 8,000,000,000
- Group Consolidated Current Assets (dec 2008): HKD 5,900,000,000
- Group Consolidated Net Current Liabilities (dec 2008): HKD 2,200,000,000
- AAICL Current Liabilities (28 Feb 2009): HKD 5,832,271,652
- AAICL Current Assets (28 Feb 2009): HKD 196,213
- AAICL Net Current Liabilities (28 Feb 2009): HKD 5,832,075,440
- CSDCL Indebtedness to AAHL (28 Feb 2009): USD 300,000,000
- CSDCL Accrued Interest (approx): USD 48,000,000
- AAMCL Facility Outstanding (due 20 Feb 2009): USD 2,600,000
- Estimated Unsecured Creditor Return (cents in the Dollar): PERCENT 41
03
Procedural history
Posture
Companies (winding Up) / Winding Up Order Made
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether each company was unable to pay its debts as they fell due
- 02
Whether presentation of petitions or events constituted events of default accelerating obligations under senior notes and inter-company loans
- 03
Whether petitioning creditors established entitlement to winding-up orders
- 04
Appropriate allocation of costs
Party arguments
- Applicant
- Petitioners asserted each company was unable to pay its debts as they fell due, pointed to demands under guarantees and inter-company indebtedness, adverse unaudited balance sheets showing large current liabilities and net current liabilities, failed buy-back offers and defaults under facility letters.
- Respondent
- The companies and related parties acknowledged liquidity problems and pursued restructuring options including a buy-back offer; some companies accepted they had no bona fide dispute to the debts but sought time for restructuring; provisional liquidators and other officers participated in the process.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Companies Ordinance, Cap. 32 / common law insolvency test
A company is insolvent if it is unable to pay its debts as they fall due.
- 02
Terms of the senior notes / contractual law
A contractual event (such as presentation of a petition by the company) can constitute an event of default under debt instruments and accelerate obligations.
- 03
Companies Ordinance, Cap. 32 / established insolvency jurisprudence
A winding-up order is proper where the petitioner proves the company cannot pay its debts and no bona fide dispute exists to the debts.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The court concluded the petitioners proved each company was unable to pay its debts as they fell due and that presentation of petitions and related defaults accelerated indebtedness; accordingly winding-up orders were made for each company and costs were to be paid out of the assets of the company concerned.
Obiter and limits
- On liquidation of AAMCL the estimated return to unsecured creditors was approximately 41 cents in the dollar.
- AAHL and AAICL had issued senior notes and pursued a buy-back offer which did not secure requisite acceptances.
- The presentation of the petition by AAHL constituted an event of default under the notes and triggered acceleration of related inter-company liabilities.
Court disposition
Winding-up orders made in respect of each of the companies named in the petitions.
- Make winding-up order in respect of each of the companies in the four petitions.
- The costs of the petitioner are to be paid out of the assets of the company concerned.
Source and reliance status
Court of First Instance · 27 July 2009
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Court of First Instance
Judgment· 27 July 2009
bjbj dinance, Cap. 32 ____ AND HCCW 141/2009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE COMPANIES (WINDING-UP) NO. 141 OF 2009 ____ IN THE MATTER of AA INVESTMENTS COMPANY LIMITED and IN THE MATTER of the Companies Ordinance, Cap. 32 ____ AND HCCW 142/2009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE COMPANIES (WINDING-UP) NO. 142 OF 2009 ____ IN THE MATTER of CHINA STEEL DEVELOPMENT COMPA |vU\ gP W gP |vU\ gP W gP nted by AAHL on the basis of an inter-company debt, CSDCL is an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of AAHL. The petition regarding AAMCL was presented by an outside creditor, Public Bank (Hong Kong) Limited. These companies are in a very substantial group known as the Asia Aluminum Group, and have been engaged in the business of aluminium processing, aluminium extrusion, aluminium rolled products, design, engineering, surface-finish and fabrication services based in the PRC. AAICL is the ultimate holding company of the Asia Aluminum Group. AAHL and AAICL were incorporated in Bermuda. AAHL has a principal place of business in Hong Kong and was registered under Part XI of the Companies Ordinance, Cap.
32. It was until 23 May 2006 a listed company in Hong Kong, the listing of its shares was withdrawn as a result of a privatisation. AAICL was incorporated for the specific purpose of implementing the privatisation of AAHL. Both AAHL and AAICL have close connections with Hong Kong. In 2004, AAHL issued 8% Senior Notes due 2011 in the aggregate of US$450 million. The principal amount outstanding on the notes as at 16 February 2009 was US$450 million. In 2006, AAICL issued 12% Senior PIK Notes due 2012 in the aggregate value of US$335 million and 14% Senior PIK Notes in the aggregate value of US$180 million. AAHL and AAICL have experienced liquidity problems since late 2008 and have been pursuing options of debt restructuring for the Group. On 16 February 2009, AAHL and AAICL issued an offer to purchase for cash whereby the noteholders were asked to accept buy-back offer of notes at a discount. The offer was not accepted by the requisite percentage of noteholders. Further, demands were made by various banks to AAHL in February and March 2009 pursuant to corporate guarantees granted by AAHL, in the aggregate sum of over US$9.9 million. AAHL has accepted that it has no bona fide dispute to these liabilities and is unable to pay the debts as they fall due. According to the unaudited consolidated balance sheet of AAICL as at December 2008, the consolidated current liabilities of the
Group amounted to over HK$8 billion, while the consolidated current assets were about HK$5.9 billion. The consolidated net current liabilities at that time, which did not include the amounts outstanding under the notes issued by AAHL and AAICL, were HK$2.2 billion. According to the unaudited balance sheet of AAICL as at 28 February 2009, its current liabilities were HK$5,832,271,652, while its current assets were only HK$196,213. The net current liabilities were HK$5,832,075,440. Both AAHL and AAICL are unable to pay the debts as they fall due. As for CSDCL, which was incorporated in Samoa, it is an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of AAHL with a principal place of business in Hong Kong. It is an investment holding company, holding all the shares in Asia Aluminum (China) Company Limited issued, to finance the investment in AACCL. The terms of the inter-company loans are such that if any amounts become due on the notes, CSDCL is liable for interest on the principal amount it has borrowed in an amount equal to such amounts due on the same principal amount of the notes. As at 28 February 2009, CSDCL was indebted to AAHL of US$300 million and interest of US$48 million odd. The presentation of the petition by AAHL against itself is an event of default under the notes. This brought about the result that the principal amount of the notes and interest accrued become immediately due and
payable and this in turn accelerated the obligation of CSDCL to repay the amounts due to AAHL under the inter-company loan agreement. CSDCL accepted it has no bona fide dispute to these debts and is unable to pay them as they fall due. The last petition is in relation to AAMCL. This company was incorporated in Hong Kong. Pursuant to the facility letter granted to AAMCL by the petitioning creditor, Public Bank (Hong Kong) Limited, in May 2008, approximately US$2.6 million was due and payable to the petitioner on 20 February 2009 and AAMCL has defaulted in payment. On 23 February 2009, the petitioner made a demand for repayment of the amount outstanding under the facility letter. AAMCL has failed to pay the outstanding sum. Further, according to the public announcement issued by AAICL and AAHL dated 4 March 2009, on a liquidation of AAMCL, the return to unsecured creditors was estimated at approximately 41 cents in the dollar. I am satisfied AAMCL is unable to pay its debts as they fall due. I make a winding-up order in respect of each of the companies in the four petitions. The costs of the petitioner are to be paid out of the assets of the company concerned. (S Kwan) Judge of the Court of First Instance High Court Miss Elizabeth Cheung, instructed by Messrs Anthony Siu & Co, for the Petitioner in HCCW Nos. 140, 141 & 142 of 2009 Mr Douglas Lam, instructed by Messrs Wilkinson &
Grist, for the Provisional Liquidators in all cases Mr William Wong, instructed by Messrs Baker & McKenzie, for the Petitioner in HCCW No. 165 of 2009 Messrs Clifford Chance, for the Supporting Creditors in HCCW No. 140 of 2009, OK Spring Roll Limited Partnership & Asia Aluminum Group Limited, attendance excused Messrs Allen & Overy, for the Joint Receivers in HCCW Nos. 140 & 141 of 2009 and PIK Holders in HCCW No. 141 of 2009, attendance excused Miss Vivian Yeung for the Official Receiver
PAGE - 1udk 1udk
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T U V ph6_ i$&~ hccw (for Susan Kwan only).dot Administrator Microsoft Word 9.0 Title Microsoft Word Document MSWordDoc Word.Document.8
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.