RE DEVELOPING ENGINEERING LTD
- Citation
- RE DEVELOPING ENGINEERING LTD
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Decision
- 13 August 2007
- Posture
- Winding Up Petition (company Insolvency) / Judgment (winding Up Order Made)
- Case number
- HCCW611/2006
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Decision
- 13 August 2007
- Posture
- Winding Up Petition (company Insolvency) / Judgment (winding Up Order Made)
- Case number
- HCCW611/2006
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The court ordered the company to be wound up because the Labour Tribunal award and other unpaid employee debts, combined with a served demand and the dismissal of the company's appeal, demonstrated inability to pay debts and justified a winding-up order.
Court disposition
Winding-up order made against Developing Engineering Limited
Orders
- The Company is to be wound up
- Petitioner's costs to be paid out of the Company's assets
02
Material facts
Parties
Liang Weifeng
PetitionerDeveloping Engineering Limited
RespondentAmounts and remedies
- Petitioner's Labour Tribunal Award: HKD 1,250
- Aggregate Indebtedness to Four Other Employees: HKD 45,314.51
- Total Costs Claimed in Awards: HKD 1,400
03
Procedural history
Posture
Winding Up Petition (company Insolvency) / Judgment (winding Up Order Made)
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the company was unable to pay its debts and thus liable to be wound up
- 02
Whether the Labour Tribunal awards and served demand satisfied the grounds for a winding-up petition
- 03
Effect of the company's appeal on presentation of the petition
Party arguments
- Applicant
- Petitioner relied on a Labour Tribunal award of $1,250.00 with interest and costs, service of a demand on 19 July 2006, and the company's failure to pay. The company also owed other employees $45,314.51 plus costs. The petition was presented on 13 November 2006 and the company's leave to appeal was dismissed on 2 August 2007, justifying a winding-up order.
- Respondent
- Company contested liability and obtained leave to appeal from the Labour Tribunal award, arguing against immediate winding up; the appeal was subsequently heard and dismissed.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Companies Ordinance, Cap. 32 / insolvency jurisprudence
A company may be wound up if it is unable to pay its debts; an unpaid judgment or tribunal award coupled with a served demand supports a winding-up petition
- 02
Companies Ordinance, Cap. 32; Labour Tribunal awards practice
An outstanding Labour Tribunal award and aggregate unpaid employee claims are relevant indicia of insolvency when considering a winding-up petition
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The court ordered the company to be wound up because the Labour Tribunal award and other unpaid employee debts, combined with a served demand and the dismissal of the company's appeal, demonstrated inability to pay debts and justified a winding-up order.
Court disposition
Winding-up order made against Developing Engineering Limited
- The Company is to be wound up
- Petitioner's costs to be paid out of the Company's assets
Source and reliance status
Court of First Instance · 13 August 2007
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Court of First Instance
Judgment· 13 August 2007
bjbj z gP nce, Cap. 32 ____ Before: Hon Kwan J in Court Date of Hearing: 13 August 2007 Date of Judgment: 13 August 2007 ___
J U D G M E N T ___ This is a petition presented by Liang Weifeng against Developing Engineering Limited ( the Company ), based on an award of $1,250.00 with interest and costs obtained by the petitioner against the Company in the Labour Tribunal on 3 April 2006 and 1 June 2006. The Company is indebted to 4 other employees in the aggregate of $45,314.51 and total costs of $1,400.00 with interest in the above awards. A demand for the above debts was served on the Company on 19 July 2006, and this winding-up petition was presented on 13 November 2006. The petition was adjourned from January 2007 due to the fact that the Company was granted leave to appeal from the Labour Tribunal award. The appeal was heard on 2 August 2007 and it was dismissed. I make an order to wind up the Company. The petitioner s costs are to be paid out of the Company s assets. (S 1udk 1udk
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T U V i$&`G T![> hccw (for Susan Kwan only).dot setup Microsoft Word 9.0 Title Microsoft Word Document MSWordDoc Word.Document.8
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.