RE FIVEOCEANS SUPPLY SERVICES LTD. (IN LIQUIDATION)
- Citation
- RE FIVEOCEANS SUPPLY SERVICES LTD. (IN LIQUIDATION)
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Decision
- 29 April 2002
- Posture
- Company Winding Up (companies Winding Up No. 1379 of 2001) / Judgment (application to Stay S228 a and Order Compulsory Winding Up)
- Case number
- HCCW1379/2001
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Decision
- 29 April 2002
- Posture
- Company Winding Up (companies Winding Up No. 1379 of 2001) / Judgment (application to Stay S228 a and Order Compulsory Winding Up)
- Case number
- HCCW1379/2001
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The court stayed the section 228A winding-up and ordered a compulsory winding-up so that section 182 remedies can be pursued; the usual winding-up order operates so that the Official Receiver becomes provisional liquidator under s194(1)(a); the court declined to displace the statutory role of the Official Receiver by appointing private provisional liquidators in his place and indicated the proper procedure is for the Official Receiver to appoint special managers and for creditors to confirm liquidators at the first meeting.
Court disposition
Stay of winding-up under section 228A granted; compulsory winding-up ordered; Official Receiver to act as provisional liquidator under s194(1)(a).
Orders
- Stay the winding-up under section 228A of the Companies Ordinance
- Make a compulsory winding-up order against Fiveoceans Supply Services Limited
- By virtue of the usual winding-up order the Official Receiver shall, by virtue of his office, become provisional liquidator under Companies Ordinance s194(1)(a)
02
Material facts
Parties
Petitioner
Petitioner (creditor) Counsel: Mr William WongFiveoceans Supply Services Limited (in liquidation)
Company (respondent)Mr Wardell and Mr Chan
Provisional Liquidators Counsel: Miss Linda ChanOfficial Receiver
Official Receiver Counsel: Miss McKennaAmounts and remedies
- Amount Owed to Petitioner (as Alleged): HKD 10,000,000
- Bank Indebtedness (approximate): HKD 15,000,000
03
Procedural history
Posture
Company Winding Up (companies Winding Up No. 1379 of 2001) / Judgment (application to Stay S228 a and Order Compulsory Winding Up)
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether to stay a winding-up under section 228A and order a compulsory winding-up
- 02
Whether dispositions of company property after commencement are void under section 182 and capable of being recovered
- 03
Whether the court may appoint private provisional liquidators in place of the Official Receiver under section 194(2)
Party arguments
- Applicant
- Petitioner argued that substantial sums were taken from the Company after presentation of the petition and seeks a stay of the section 228A winding-up and a compulsory winding-up so that section 182 can be invoked to void and recover post-commencement dispositions.
- Respondent
- Provisional liquidators supported the Petitioner. The Official Receiver's position was that section 194(1)(a) makes the Official Receiver the provisional liquidator by virtue of his office and that appointment of private provisional liquidators in his place is not appropriate under the statutory wording; the proper route is for the Official Receiver to appoint special managers and for creditors to confirm liquidators at the first meeting.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Companies Ordinance, Cap. 32, s182
A disposition of company property after commencement of a court winding-up is void unless the court orders otherwise.
- 02
Companies Ordinance, Cap. 32, s194(1)(a)
The Official Receiver, by virtue of his office, becomes provisional liquidator on a court winding-up order.
- 03
Companies Ordinance, Cap. 32, s228A
The court has power under the Companies Ordinance to appoint provisional liquidators in appropriate circumstances, including under section 228A procedure.
- 04
Companies Ordinance, Cap. 32, s194(2)
Section 194(2) provides for appointment of persons by the court in certain circumstances, but such appointment must be read in context with subsection (1)(a).
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The court stayed the section 228A winding-up and ordered a compulsory winding-up so that section 182 remedies can be pursued; the usual winding-up order operates so that the Official Receiver becomes provisional liquidator under s194(1)(a); the court declined to displace the statutory role of the Official Receiver by appointing private provisional liquidators in his place and indicated the proper procedure is for the Official Receiver to appoint special managers and for creditors to confirm liquidators at the first meeting.
Obiter and limits
- Section 194(1)(a) is expressly subject to paragraph (aa) and subsection 1(A) and does not expressly refer to subsection (2).
- The Official Receiver may, if he considers it necessary or desirable, appoint Mr Wardell and Mr Chan as special managers until the first meeting of creditors.
- Liquidators supported the Petitioner and there was no reason not to grant the stay and compulsory winding-up.
Court disposition
Stay of winding-up under section 228A granted; compulsory winding-up ordered; Official Receiver to act as provisional liquidator under s194(1)(a).
- Stay the winding-up under section 228A of the Companies Ordinance
- Make a compulsory winding-up order against Fiveoceans Supply Services Limited
- By virtue of the usual winding-up order the Official Receiver shall, by virtue of his office, become provisional liquidator under Companies Ordinance s194(1)(a)
Source and reliance status
Court of First Instance · 29 April 2002
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Court of First Instance
Judgment· 29 April 2002
bjbj HCCW 1379/2001
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE COMPANIES WINDING-UP NO. 1379 OF 2001 ____ IN THE MATTER OF the Companies Ordinance, Chapter 32 and IN THE MATTER OF FIVEOCEANS SUPPLY SERVICES LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) ____ Before: Hon Yuen J in Court Dates of Hearing: 29 April 2002 Date of Judgment: 29 April 2002 ___
J U D G M E N T ___ On 20 December 2001, a petition was presented for the winding-up of Fiveoceans Supply Services Limited (which I shall refer to as the Company ) by the Petitioner to whom the Company owed a sum of about $10,000,000.00 by way of facilities. Shortly after the petition was presented on 31 December 2001, an application was made by the Company for a validation order in order to enable it to carry on operations, it being alleged that administative expenses had been incurred. That application was subsequently withdrawn on 5 February 2002 without the matter having been heard by a court. It transpired that on 21 January 2002, the Company had been placed in liquidation under the provision in section 228A. Mr Wardell and Mr Chan were appointed provisional liquidators. It would appear that as far as this Company is concerned, there is one major creditor, being the bank (to the tune of about $15,000,000 now) but there may be other smaller creditors. The Petitioner has now asked for an order that the winding-up under section 228A be stayed and that the Company be wound-up compulsorily. The reason for this application is that it has been shown that a substantial amount of money has been taken out of the Company after the presentation of the petition and the purpose of the stay of the winding-up under section 228A and a compulsory winding-up is so that the
provisions of section 182 of the Companies Ordinance can be relied upon. Section 182 provides that in a winding-up by the court, any disposition of the property of the Company made after the commencement of the winding-up shall, unless the court otherwise orders, be void. In other words, it is the Petitioner s intention that at least some of the payments out could be recovered under this provision which would not have been available under a section 228A application. The liquidators support this application and I see no reason why I should not grant it. Accordingly, I would stay the winding-up under section 228A and I would wind-up the Company compulsorily with the usual winding-up order. In this regard, the usual winding-up order provides that the Official Receiver shall, by virtue of his office, become the provisional liquidator and shall continue to act as such until he or another person becomes liquidator and is capable of acting as such. That is under section 194(1)(a) of the Companies Ordinance.
7. Miss Mckenna has asked by way of a motion that Mr Wardell and Mr Chan be appointed joint and several provisional liquidators in place of the Official Receiver and it is said that section 194(2) permits the court to make such an order. I have some difficulty accepting that submission as section 194(1)(a) specifically refers to it being subject to paragraph (aa) and subsection 1(A) but not to subsection (2). Therefore I would have thought that the appropriate procedure would be for the Official Receiver being, by virtue of his office, the provisional liquidator, to apply to appoint Mr Wardell and Mr Chan (if he considers it necessary or desirable to do so) to be special managers until the first meeting of creditors, at which time, if all creditors or the relevant percentage of creditors agree, Mr Wardell and Mr Chan could continue as full liquidators. (MARIA YUEN) Judge of the Court of First Instance High Court Mr William Wong, instructed by Wilkinson & Grist, for the Petitioner Miss Linda Chan, instructed by Wilkinson & Grist, for Provisional Liquidators Miss McKenna from the Official Receiver s Office
PAGE -
PAGE - &`#$ \zh: \zh: & 6" HCCW 1379/2001 Pinky Normal.dot setup Microsoft Word 9.0 nKva nKva HCCW 1379/2001 Title Microsoft Word Document MSWordDoc Word.Document.8
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.