Hong Kong Judgment

Court of First Instance

RE PANG KA HO AND ANOTHER

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The Court was satisfied applicants are registered proprietors, the mortgage remains on the Lands and the mortgagee cannot be found; the proposed sum of $5,460 is reasonable to redeem the mortgage (including interest) and therefore leave to pay that sum into Court is granted, subject to advertisement and the usual post-payment procedural steps for a section 12A application.

Court disposition

Leave granted to pay $5,460 into Court; no order as to costs; directions for advertisement and subsequent paper application for declaration under section 12A CPO

Orders

  • Leave granted to the applicants to pay into Court a sum of $5,460 being a sum sufficient to redeem the Mortgage and any interest thereon
  • Within 14 days after the payment into Court is made, the applicants do advertise in a widely circulated local Chinese newspaper a notice making known this Order and the fact of payment having been made into Court pursuant to this Order and stating that any person interested in the Mortgage and/or the payment aforesaid may apply within 14 days to be joined as a defendant to these proceedings
  • The applicants may after the lapse of no less than 21 days from the publication of the advertisement make a paper application pursuant to section 12A(2) of the CPO for a declaration that the Lands be free from the Mortgage
  • There be no order as to costs

02

Material facts

Parties

Pang Ka Ho

Applicant Counsel: Mr S. Y. Danny Chan of Leung Ki Hin & Co

Chan Muk Shang

Mortgagee/encumbrancer

H. Au-Yeung

Judge

Amounts and remedies

  • Sum to Be Paid Into Court: HKD 5,460

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Miscellaneous Proceedings Under Section 12 a Conveyancing and Property Ordinance (cap.219) / Ex Parte Originating Summons Seeking Leave to Pay Sum Into Court and for Subsequent Declaration That Land Be Free From Mortgage

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Applicants are the registered owners of the Lands, the Lands remain subject to a mortgage in favour of Chan Muk Shang, reasonable steps to locate the mortgagee have failed, and applicants seek leave to pay $5,460 into Court as a sum sufficient to redeem the mortgage and interest based on the amount owed and a notional annual interest rate of 20%

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Section 12A Conveyancing and Property Ordinance, Cap.219

    Court may, where encumbrancer is out of jurisdiction, cannot be found or is unknown, allow payment into Court of a sum sufficient to redeem the encumbrance and thereafter declare the land free from the encumbrance

  2. 02

    Re Cheung Chi Wang & Another [2002] 1 HKLRD 409 (Lam PJ)

    Court has discretion whether to give notice to the encumbrancer and adopts a staged approach to payment into Court and declaration

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The Court was satisfied applicants are registered proprietors, the mortgage remains on the Lands and the mortgagee cannot be found; the proposed sum of $5,460 is reasonable to redeem the mortgage (including interest) and therefore leave to pay that sum into Court is granted, subject to advertisement and the usual post-payment procedural steps for a section 12A application.

Obiter and limits

  • Three-stage approach to section 12A applications: (1) court approval for payment into Court where encumbrancer cannot be found, (2) exercise of discretion to declare land free from encumbrance after payment, (3) application by encumbrancer or person entitled to the fund for payment out
  • Court may certify reasonable costs of applicant to be deducted from the sum paid into Court

Court disposition

Leave granted to pay $5,460 into Court; no order as to costs; directions for advertisement and subsequent paper application for declaration under section 12A CPO

  • Leave granted to the applicants to pay into Court a sum of $5,460 being a sum sufficient to redeem the Mortgage and any interest thereon
  • Within 14 days after the payment into Court is made, the applicants do advertise in a widely circulated local Chinese newspaper a notice making known this Order and the fact of payment having been made into Court pursuant to this Order and stating that any person interested in the Mortgage and/or the payment aforesaid may apply within 14 days to be joined as a defendant to these proceedings
  • The applicants may after the lapse of no less than 21 days from the publication of the advertisement make a paper application pursuant to section 12A(2) of the CPO for a declaration that the Lands be free from the Mortgage
  • There be no order as to costs

Source and reliance status

Court of First Instance · 27 September 2023

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court of First Instance

Judgment· 27 September 2023

[2023] HKCFI 2511

bjbj HCMP 1397/2023 [2023] HKCFI 2511

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 1397 OF 2023 -------------------------- IN THE MATTER of ALL THOSE pieces or parcels of land known as Section A of Lot No. 1748 and The Remaining Portion of Lot No. 1748 both in Demarcation District No.76 (hereafter collectively referred to as the said Properties ) and IN THE MATTER of the Mortgage registered in the Land Registry by Memorial No. N54074 originally against Lot No. 1748 both in Demarcation District No.76 and now against Section A of Lot No. 1748 and The Remaining Portion of Lot No. 1748 both in Demarcation District No.76 in favour of CHAN MUK SHANG ( the said Mortgage ) and IN THE MATTER of an application for declaration/order under Section 12A of the Conveyancing and Property Ordinance, Cap.219 and IN THE MATTER of Order 88 of the Rules of the High Court, Cap.4A, Laws of Hong Kong ____ PANG KA HO ( _____

JUDGMENT ______

THE APPLICATION By an Ex Parte Originating Summons filed on 28 August 2023, the applicants applied for an order pursuant to section 12A of the Conveyancing and Property Ordinance (Cap 219, Laws of Hong Kong) ( the CPO ) that the properties known as Section A of Lot No. 1748 and The Remaining Portion of Lot No. 1748 both in Demarcation District No.76 (collectively, the Lands ), upon payment into Court of a sum of money, be free from a mortgage registered in the Land Registry against the Lands in favour of Chan Muk Shang ( the Mortgagee ) dated 9 January 1923 ( the Mortgage ).

THE LAW Section 12A of the CPO provides that: (1) Where land is subject to any encumbrance, whether immediately realizable or payable or not, and the encumbrancer is out of the jurisdiction, cannot be found or is unknown, or if it is uncertain who the encumbrancer is, the court may, if it thinks fit, on the application of the party for the time being entitled to redeem the encumbrance, direct or allow payment into court of a sum of money sufficient to redeem the encumbrance and any interest thereon. (2) Upon payment into court of the sum referred to in subsection (1), the court may, if it thinks fit, and either after or without any notice to the encumbrancer, as the court thinks fit, declare the land to be free from the encumbrance, and make any order for conveyance or vesting order as appropriate, and give directions for the retention and investment of the sum of money paid into court and for the payment or application of the income thereof, and for the payment of an amount certified by the court to be the reasonable costs of the applicant in making the application, such amount to be deducted from the sum of money paid into court. (3) On application by the encumbrancer or any person entitled to the money or fund in court, the court may direct payment or transfer thereof to the persons entitled to receive or give a discharge for the same, and generally may give directions

respecting the application ion to an application made under section 12A of the CPO has been given by Deputy High Court Judge Lam (as Lam PJ then was) in Re Cheung Chi Wang & Another [2002] 1 HKLRD 409. There are three stages in this application: The first stage is for the party for the time being entitled to redeem the encumbrance to obtain a direction or approval of the court regarding payment into court provided it is shown that the encumbrancer is out of the jurisdiction, cannot be found or is unknown, or if it is uncertain who the encumbrancer is. In the second stage, on the basis that payment into Court is made pursuant to the Court s approval, the Court will consider the exercise of its discretion and declare the land to be free from the encumbrance. At this stage, the Court has the discretion to decide whether notice should be given to the encumbrancer. The matter would come to its third stage when the encumbrancer or any person entitled to the money paid into Court applies to the Court for payment.

DISCUSSION Having considered the affirmation filed in support of this application, I am satisfied that: The applicants are the respective registered owners of the Lands; The Lands are still subject to the Mortgage; The applicants are entitled to redeem the Mortgage. I am also satisfied that reasonable steps have been undertaken to locate the Mortgagee but in vain. Since the Mortgagee cannot be found, section 12A(1) of the CPO is engaged. In respect of the payment to be paid into Court, Mr Chan for the applicants agreed that the sum be fixed at $5,460. Having regard to the amount owed (including interest) under the Mortgage and the notional annual interest rate of 20% which was adopted, I accept that the proposed sum is reasonable.

ORDER By reasons of the aforesaid, I make the following orders as proposed by the applicants: Leave be granted to the applicants to pay into Court a sum of $5,460 being a sum sufficient to redeem the Mortgage and any interest thereon; Within 14 days after the payment into Court is made, the applicants do advertise in a widely circulated local Chinese newspaper a notice making known this Order and the fact of payment having been made into Court pursuant to this Order and stating that any person interested in the Mortgage and/or the payment aforesaid may apply within 14 days to be joined as a defendant to these proceedings; The applicants may after the lapse of no less than 21 days from the publication of the advertisement make a paper application pursuant to section 12A(2) of the CPO for a declaration that the Lands be free from the Mortgage; and There be no order as to costs. ( H. Au-Yeung ) Deputy High Court Judge Mr S. Y. Danny Chan of Leung Ki Hin & Co, for the applicants

PAGE

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

J

K

L

M

N

O

P

Q

R

S

T

U

V

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

J

K

L

M

N

O

P

Q

R

S

T

U

V

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H I J ylb[bND> gdvx gdvx (#p# gdvx gdvx gdvx hFa hFa gdFa uoi`ZT hFa hFa hFa hFa hFa h%sd h ?p h%sd gd ?p gd%sd gd%sd xtmcmtmcmcmcmcmtmcm hSAo gd I gd I gdSAo c}u} }u}u hSAo gd I gd I gd I gd I gd I gd I hSAo gd I gd I gd I gd I gd I gd I hSAo gd I gd I hSAo hSAo hSAo gdvx {q{b{q h%sd gdy-[ gdy-[ gdy-[ gdy-[ gdy-[ hy-[

K

L

M

N

O

P

Q

R

S

T

U

V

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

J

K

L

M

N

O

P

Q

R

S

T U V gdvx :pnN :py-[ [Content_Types].xml _rels/.rels theme/theme/themeManager.xml K Y, sQ}# theme/theme/theme1.xml $O}) Xp90 +PHI| PP yu 9xu5 fs+W VF7H q=. 8}d- qyI@ j!Q_ jyV` |PZ+ T ""p < 4V O&x$ A8>v ;EUC n 8r *~P(5 .}x E /,EE\} theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.rels 5 6?$Q K(M&$R(.1 [Content_Types].xmlPK _rels/.relsPK theme/theme/themeManager.xmlPK theme/theme/theme1.xmlPK theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.relsPK <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?> <a:clrMap xmlns:a="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/main" bg1="lt1" tx1="dk1" bg2="lt2" tx2="dk2" accent1="accent1" accent2="accent2" accent3="accent3" accent4="accent4" accent5="accent5" accent6="accent6" hlink="hlink"

folHlink="folHlink"/> [Content_Types].xml dlyLho ;d]6 yJ.; _rels/.rels fLV:* ]m@= T;GI b9`5 drs/e2oDoc.xml XbzA 5@5E (,Zl g!i'j =8|cW ~ZOQoGu [b9F ( P- 5Vlz drs/downrev.xmlL z|X^_@ (OyQ3 [Content_Types].xmlPK _rels/.relsPK drs/e2oDoc.xmlPK drs/downrev.xmlPK [Content_Types].xml dlyLho ;d]6 yJ.; _rels/.rels fLV:* ]m@= T;GI b9`5 drs/e2oDoc.xml [qV{i 1Y-I 'fB( ql4{ EX | ( P5 drs/downrev.xmlL or.W3 [Content_Types].xmlPK _rels/.relsPK drs/e2oDoc.xmlPK drs/downrev.xmlPK [Content_Types].xml dlyLho ;d]6 yJ.; _rels/.rels fLV:* ]m@= T;GI b9`5 drs/e2oDoc.xml Q1P JUU?`` #R+^ 1Y.H Vz@y {M?9 U^N6 0J'J *C N axK` @ZeV drs/downrev.xmlL x1ti [Content_Types].xmlPK _rels/.relsPK drs/e2oDoc.xmlPK drs/downrev.xmlPK [Content_Types].xml dlyLho ;d]6 yJ.; _rels/.rels fLV:* ]m@= T;GI b9`5 drs/e2oDoc.xml ;{)N qKG@ KZo, >3m+ 9@6E CtE8 GfB( hGA% /fyQ]W u'9 NjqP`A 7xqt A`>i O-T3 (Mo| y zle drs/downrev.xmlL z|X^_@ (OyQ3 [Content_Types].xmlPK _rels/.relsPK drs/e2oDoc.xmlPK drs/downrev.xmlPK [Content_Types].xml dlyLho ;d]6 yJ.; _rels/.rels fLV:* ]m@= T;GI b9`5 drs/e2oDoc.xml fBmK X7Z2n VTV;] e`9f drvt Xz<1 `k!e4 vs#- q>ZO mZx* tx)B{ drs/downrev.xmlL eRp# oj{S [Content_Types].xmlPK _rels/.relsPK drs/e2oDoc.xmlPK drs/downrev.xmlPK [Content_Types].xml dlyLho ;d]6 yJ.; _rels/.rels fLV:* ]m@= T;GI b9`5 drs/e2oDoc.xml uV{i )F\Q /_\ ;KL' .=C n[Ay #Ez( #*Cv jpz4 Q;~c T(l Gprxp> n{'-: Yu[] 7MbV drs/downrev.xmlL x1ti [Content_Types].xmlPK _rels/.relsPK drs/e2oDoc.xmlPK drs/downrev.xmlPK j1VB &z@; XJ` ,"8f9\ U];D R9P[Y0 Nwe+?8 iU];D \+qXJ` tma|@1

CACV Jeannie MY MokSo Normal.dotm Windows User Microsoft Office Word Judiciary

CACV Title <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?><b:Sources SelectedStyle="\APA.XSL" StyleName="APA" xmlns:b="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" xmlns="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography"></b:Sources> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?> <ds:datastoreItem ds:itemID="{6F900EC8-28F5-454E-93EE-2190094A7F0F}" xmlns:ds="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/customXml"><ds:schemaRefs><ds:schemaRef ds:uri="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography"/></ds:schemaRefs></ds:datastoreItem> Microsoft Word 97-2003 Document MSWordDoc Word.Document.8

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Re Cheung Chi Wang & Another [2002] 1 HKLRD 409

Case cited

Conveyancing and Property Ordinance, Cap.219 s.12A

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Rules of the High Court, Order 88, Cap.4A

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.