JABRIN LTD v. UNLONG TUNG YICK LAND INVESTMENT CO LTD
Where transferees have paid for shares and transfers were presented for registration, and where the company/directors have failed to exercise any veto within a reasonable time (including where there is no effective board), the transferee is entitled to registration and the court will refuse rectification removing...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- JABRIN LTD v. UNLONG TUNG YICK LAND INVESTMENT CO LTD
- Parties
- Applicants: Applicants (19 named and additional applicants); Plaintiff / 3rd Respondent (in Some Proceedings): Jabrin Limited; Defendant / 1st Respondent (in Some Proceedings): Unlong Tung Yick Land Investment Co. Ltd.; Respondent / Director: CHAN Wai-to (and co-directors)
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 13 October 1980
- Case Number
- HCMP589/1980
- Procedural Posture
- Companies / Shareholder Disputes and Related Interlocutory Applications / Hearing in Chambers on Multiple Interlocutory Applications (appointment of Receiver; Summonses for Meeting; Motions for Rectification; Stay Applications)
- Outcome
- Applicants' motions dismissed; interlocutory stay discharged; court ordered meeting; receiver appointed; ex parte order discharged; costs awarded to successful applicants; further show‑cause directed against solicitors who obtained the ex‑parte order.
- Legal Topics
- Rectification of Register of Members, Locus Standi to Apply Under Companies Ordinance S114(2), Court‑ordered General Meeting, Appointment of Receiver and Manager, Discharge of Ex Parte Order Obtained by Suppression of Material Facts
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Applicants (19 named and additional applicants)
Applicants
Jabrin Limited
Plaintiff / 3rd Respondent (in Some Proceedings)
Unlong Tung Yick Land Investment Co. Ltd.
Defendant / 1st Respondent (in Some Proceedings)
CHAN Wai-to (and co-directors)
Respondent / Director
Procedural Posture
Companies / Shareholder Disputes and Related Interlocutory Applications / Hearing in Chambers on Multiple Interlocutory Applications (appointment of Receiver; Summonses for Meeting; Motions for Rectification; Stay Applications)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Jabrin Limited should be removed from the company's register of members (rectification under s100)
- 2 Whether Jabrin Limited had locus standi to apply under s114(2) to convene a court‑ordered general meeting
- 3 Whether the ex parte stay should be discharged for suppression of material facts
Ratio Decidendi
Where transferees have paid for shares and transfers were presented for registration, and where the company/directors have failed to exercise any veto within a reasonable time (including where there is no effective board), the transferee is entitled to registration and the court will refuse rectification removing the transferee; ex parte orders obtained by suppression of material facts will be discharged; where management dereliction threatens company property or contractual performance the court will appoint a receiver to protect the assets and business.
Court Disposition
Applicants' motions dismissed; interlocutory stay discharged; court ordered meeting; receiver appointed; ex parte order discharged; costs awarded to successful applicants; further show‑cause directed against solicitors who obtained the ex‑parte order.
Orders
- Dismissed the summons for stay of the order of Mr Justice Garcia (HCMP 589/80) with costs.
- Dismissed the Notices of Motion in HCMP 712/80 with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment