HKSAR v. SO CHI MING
The appellate judge was satisfied, on the totality of the evidence including photographs and the officer's immediate conduct, that the magistrate's acceptance of the officer's account was not unsafe and the offence was proved beyond reasonable doubt; accordingly the conviction was upheld.
- Citation
- HKSAR v. SO CHI MING
- Parties
- Appellant/defendant: So Chi Ming; Respondent/prosecution: Department of Justice
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 7 November 2007
- Case Number
- HCMA856/2007
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal Against Conviction Under Road Traffic (traffic Control) Regulations / Appeal Judgment (high Court)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; conviction upheld.
- Legal Topics
- Red Light Offence, Credibility Assessment, Reasonable Excuse, Appeal on Factual Findings
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
So Chi Ming
Appellant/defendant
Department of Justice
Respondent/prosecution
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal Against Conviction Under Road Traffic (traffic Control) Regulations / Appeal Judgment (high Court)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant ran a red light
- 2 Whether the magistrate's credibility findings were open to appellate interference
- 3 Whether the defendant had a reasonable excuse (insufficient time to stop)
Ratio Decidendi
The appellate judge was satisfied, on the totality of the evidence including photographs and the officer's immediate conduct, that the magistrate's acceptance of the officer's account was not unsafe and the offence was proved beyond reasonable doubt; accordingly the conviction was upheld.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; conviction upheld.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed; conviction upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment