RE GOODWAY LTD
The court held that the consideration was paid under a mistake of law as to the assignability of most claims; applying Ex parte James the Official Receiver, as officer of the court, must act impartially and repay the mistaken consideration. The court sanctioned a refund of $349,900 to Yook Tong, ascribed token value $100 to the validly assigned claims, and ordered that the committee vacancy need not be filled; no order as to costs was made.
- Citation
- RE GOODWAY LTD
- Parties
- Applicant/liquidator: Official Receiver (liquidator of Goodway Limited); Company (in Liquidation): Goodway Limited; Assignee/claimant: Yook Tong Electric Company Limited; Defendant in Underlying Action: Pirelli Cavi E Sistemi SPA; Creditor/objector: Prysmian Cables Limited
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 26 September 2008
- Case Number
- HCCW162/1998
- Procedural Posture
- Companies (winding Up) No. 162 of 1998 / Chambers Directions and Sanction Hearing (ex Parte Application)
- Outcome
- Application granted in part: order under s.207(7) that vacancy need not be filled; sanction granted under s.200(3) to refund $349,900 to Yook Tong and to ascribe token value $100 to validly assigned claims; no order as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- Refund Under Ex Parte James, Assignment of Contractual Claims, Mistake of Law, Duties of Liquidator, Committee of Inspection
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Official Receiver (liquidator of Goodway Limited)
Applicant/liquidator
Goodway Limited
Company (in Liquidation)
Yook Tong Electric Company Limited
Assignee/claimant
Pirelli Cavi E Sistemi SPA
Defendant in Underlying Action
Prysmian Cables Limited
Creditor/objector
Procedural Posture
Companies (winding Up) No. 162 of 1998 / Chambers Directions and Sanction Hearing (ex Parte Application)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether vacancy in committee of inspection need be filled under s.207(7) Cap.32
- 2 Whether the Official Receiver should be sanctioned under s.200(3) Cap.32 to refund consideration paid under the assignment
- 3 Whether the consideration was paid under a mistake of law such that equity requires restitution
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the consideration was paid under a mistake of law as to the assignability of most claims; applying Ex parte James the Official Receiver, as officer of the court, must act impartially and repay the mistaken consideration. The court sanctioned a refund of $349,900 to Yook Tong, ascribed token value $100 to the validly assigned claims, and ordered that the committee vacancy need not be filled; no order as to costs was made.
Court Disposition
Application granted in part: order under s.207(7) that vacancy need not be filled; sanction granted under s.200(3) to refund $349,900 to Yook Tong and to ascribe token value $100 to validly assigned claims; no order as to costs.
Orders
- Order under Companies Ordinance Cap.32 s.207(7) that the vacancy in the committee of inspection need not be filled.
- Sanction under Companies Ordinance Cap.32 s.200(3) authorising the Official Receiver to refund HKD 349900 to Yook Tong Electric Company Limited.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment