RE RAFAT ALI RIZVI AND OTHERS
The Court held that the judgment registering and enforcing the Indonesian external confiscation order and appointing receivers as enforcement receivers finally determined the rights of the defendants in respect of the specified property; therefore the judgment was final (not interlocutory) for appeal purposes and leave to appeal was not required. Consequent applications by D1, D2 and D12 to discharge the restraint order were properly dismissed and the appointment of the receivers as enforcement receivers was appropriate to enforce the registered external confiscation order.
- Citation
- RE RAFAT ALI RIZVI AND OTHERS
- Parties
- 1st Defendant: Rafat Ali Rizvi; 2nd Defendant: Hesham Talaat Mohamed Al-Warraq; 12th Defendant: First Gulf Asia Holdings Limited; Applicant / Representative of Indonesian Government: Secretary for Justice
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 29 April 2014
- Case Number
- HCMP2557/2010
- Procedural Posture
- Mutual Legal Assistance / Registration and Enforcement of External Confiscation Order / Judgment at First Instance; Application for Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- Secretary's applications to register the external confiscation order and to appoint the Receivers as enforcement Receivers allowed; D1, D2 and D12's application to discharge the restraint order dismissed; judgment treated as final for appeal purposes; leave to appeal not required (and would be granted if necessary).
- Legal Topics
- Registration of External Confiscation Order, Restraint Order, Appointment of Receivers/enforcement Receivers, Final Vs Interlocutory Judgment Determination
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rafat Ali Rizvi
1st Defendant
Hesham Talaat Mohamed Al-Warraq
2nd Defendant
First Gulf Asia Holdings Limited
12th Defendant
Secretary for Justice
Applicant / Representative of Indonesian Government
Procedural Posture
Mutual Legal Assistance / Registration and Enforcement of External Confiscation Order / Judgment at First Instance; Application for Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Court's judgment registering and enforcing an external confiscation order and appointing enforcement receivers was final or interlocutory
- 2 Whether leave to appeal was required
- 3 Whether the restraint order should be discharged in light of registration of the external confiscation order
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that the judgment registering and enforcing the Indonesian external confiscation order and appointing receivers as enforcement receivers finally determined the rights of the defendants in respect of the specified property; therefore the judgment was final (not interlocutory) for appeal purposes and leave to appeal was not required. Consequent applications by D1, D2 and D12 to discharge the restraint order were properly dismissed and the appointment of the receivers as enforcement receivers was appropriate to enforce the registered external confiscation order.
Court Disposition
Secretary's applications to register the external confiscation order and to appoint the Receivers as enforcement Receivers allowed; D1, D2 and D12's application to discharge the restraint order dismissed; judgment treated as final for appeal purposes; leave to appeal not required (and would be granted if necessary).
Orders
- Register the Indonesian external confiscation orders (Verdict 3 and Verdict 5E) as external confiscation orders in Hong Kong pursuant to Cap 525
- Appoint the existing Receivers as enforcement Receivers to enforce the registered external confiscation orders
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment