RE WONG BILL WAI WO aka BILL WONG and BILL WAI WO WONG, deceased
Angie was passed over and Esther appointed administratrix because Angie failed to keep and furnish clear and accurate accounts (including non-disclosure of at least one tenant's rental payments into Angie’s personal account), there was a real conflict of interest if Angie remained executrix and no reasonable expectation she would promptly remedy accounting failures; on the Further Evidence Application the Ladd v Marshall first condition failed because the evidence was in Angie’s possession before the Master, so fresh evidence was refused.
- Citation
- [2023] HKCFI 1364
- Parties
- Person Warning; Nominated Executrix: Madam Wong-Martin Angie Sie Ying; Caveator; Administratrix (appointed): Madam Esther Mak Wong; Deceased: Wong Bill Wai Wo
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 22 May 2023
- Case Number
- HCCA5077/2018
- Procedural Posture
- Probate and Administration Caveat and Removal of Executor (appeal) / Appeal to Court of First Instance; Hearing 22 September 2020; Judgment Delivered May 2023
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; Master Hui’s order affirmed: Angie passed over as executrix of the Hong Kong estate and Esther appointed administratrix; application for further evidence dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Removal of Executor, Appointment of Administratrix, Admission of Fresh Evidence on Appeal, Duty to Account by Personal Representative, Conflict of Interest
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Madam Wong-Martin Angie Sie Ying
Person Warning; Nominated Executrix
Madam Esther Mak Wong
Caveator; Administratrix (appointed)
Wong Bill Wai Wo
Deceased
Procedural Posture
Probate and Administration Caveat and Removal of Executor (appeal) / Appeal to Court of First Instance; Hearing 22 September 2020; Judgment Delivered May 2023
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the nominated executrix should be passed over and replaced with the administratrix under ss 33(3) and 36 of the Probate and Administration Ordinance
- 2 Whether the executrix failed to keep and furnish clear and accurate estate accounts and concealed rental income
- 3 Whether the executrix’s position gives rise to a conflict of interest preventing proper administration
Ratio Decidendi
Angie was passed over and Esther appointed administratrix because Angie failed to keep and furnish clear and accurate accounts (including non-disclosure of at least one tenant's rental payments into Angie’s personal account), there was a real conflict of interest if Angie remained executrix and no reasonable expectation she would promptly remedy accounting failures; on the Further Evidence Application the Ladd v Marshall first condition failed because the evidence was in Angie’s possession before the Master, so fresh evidence was refused.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; Master Hui’s order affirmed: Angie passed over as executrix of the Hong Kong estate and Esther appointed administratrix; application for further evidence dismissed.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Further Evidence Application dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment