RE SUNNI INTERNATIONAL LTD (In Liquidation)

RE SUNNI INTERNATIONAL LTD (In Liquidation)

Applicant failed to discharge the heavy onus to show cause for removal: inspection summons had been dismissed; Fung acted reasonably on Official Receiver papers and made inquiries when informed of Applicant's shareholding; Applicant was not a creditor and creditors (and COI) supported Fung; potential recoveries require funded litigation and removal would cause delay and costs; therefore removal was not for the general advantage of those interested in the assets.

Citation
[2018] HKCFI 2371
Parties
Applicant (contributory): Asia Pacific Glory Limited; Liquidator/respondent: Fung Chi Keung; Company (in Liquidation): Sunni International Limited (In Liquidation)
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
29 October 2018
Case Number
HCCW121/2013
Procedural Posture
Companies (winding Up) Proceedings / Application for Removal of Liquidator (decision)
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Removal of Liquidator, Fiduciary Duties of Liquidator, Contributory and Creditor Rights, Disclosure/inspection of Liquidation Records, Committee of Inspection
Source Language
EN

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 14 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Asia Pacific Glory Limited

Applicant (contributory)

Fung Chi Keung

Liquidator/respondent

Sunni International Limited (In Liquidation)

Company (in Liquidation)

Procedural Posture

Companies (winding Up) Proceedings / Application for Removal of Liquidator (decision)

  1. 1 Whether cause shown to remove liquidator under s196 CO
  2. 2 Whether liquidator acted with bias or partiality in refusing disclosure and in recognizing contributories
  3. 3 Whether liquidator failed to verify contributories and creditors by independent investigation

Ratio Decidendi

Applicant failed to discharge the heavy onus to show cause for removal: inspection summons had been dismissed; Fung acted reasonably on Official Receiver papers and made inquiries when informed of Applicant's shareholding; Applicant was not a creditor and creditors (and COI) supported Fung; potential recoveries require funded litigation and removal would cause delay and costs; therefore removal was not for the general advantage of those interested in the assets.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • Dismissed Asia Pacific Glory Limited's summons dated 21 November 2017 as amended on 3 May 2018
  • Costs to the Liquidator to be taxed if not agreed